Use Translator to translate into YOUR language
http://babelfish.altavista.com/
http://dictionaries.travlang.com/Dutch.html
tekst door John Kuhles (mei 2004)
|
WAT gaat de nieuwe EUROPESE grondwet hierover vermelden -Als- er dit soort crises ontstaat ?
hoe gaat de "nood breekt wet", scenario er uitzien ?
(basis voor iedere ondemocratische politie-staat)
minimaal 10% van ONZE belastinggeld wordt in het geheim besteedt dus geen controle van de EU-burger op HOE het geld wordt besteedt ... samenwerking met diverse "rechtssystemen" + USA (zonder echte tegengas) nieuwe wetten die AMPER worden uitgelegd wat de uiteindelijke negatieve consequenties zijn!
EU-wetgeving 2005-2012, en de -uitvoerende- macht ... met een "bevel = bevel" gedrag ?
Als buitenaardsen officieel bekend zouden worden gemaakt ...bestaan er dan (geheime) richtlijnen een soort draaiboek met protocollen,
o.a. bedoeld voor:
JA, USA jaren 50, Frankrijk: Cometa Rapport 1998-1999, EU-parlement 1993 gedeeltelijk tegengewerkt door de Britten
United Nations UFO-Report (1978)
European Parlement UFO-Report (1990-1993)
JA, jaren 70+90 o.a. SHAPE HQ
JA,
1969 t/m nu... zie o.a.
www.space.com of NASA & wetgeving:
JA,
(sinds de jaren 70 t/m nu)
JA, 1963: verzoek door JFK persoonlijk aan Joint
Chiefs of Staff, CIA & Nasa, 1978 UN-onderzoek tegengewerkt door de USA/CIA
JA: Pilot instructions for UFO reporting (CIRVIS instructions) in section B-39
of the DoD (Department of Defense) Flight Information Handbook (FIH).
Air Force Regulation 200-2, ``Unidentified Flying Objects Reporting,'' for example, prohibits the release to the public and the media of any data about ``those objects which are not explainable.''
An even more restrictive procedure is outlined in the Joint Army Navy Air Force Publication 146, which threatens to prosecute anyone under its jurisdiction - including pilots, civilian agencies, merchant marine captains, and even some fishing vessels -for disclosing reports of sightings relevant to US security.
You may know that for many years the
US Air Force has
Pilot instructions for UFO reporting (CIRVIS instructions) in section B-39 of the DoD (Department of Defense) Flight Information Handbook (FIH). Since July 2001 The US Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) is for the first time including a paragraph about UFO reports in its Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM). The UFO reporting instructions are in Section 6, par. 7-6-4, Safety, Accident, and Hazard Reports
ESA?
(moet ik nog uitzoeken ! -JK-)
JA, CIA-Robertson Panel en daardoor zeer waarschijnlijk nu ook indirect de AIVD !!!
Air Force Regulation 200-2, ``Unidentified Flying Objects Reporting,'' for example, prohibits the release to the public and the media of any data about ``those objects which are not explainable.''
An even more restrictive procedure is outlined in the Joint Army Navy Air Force Publication 146, which threatens to prosecute anyone under its jurisdiction - including pilots, civilian agencies, merchant marine captains, and even some fishing vessels -for disclosing reports of sightings relevant to US security.
JA, in 1992 (Als reactie op de 500 jaar herdenking van Columbus die Amerika
"ontdekte" + nieuw SETI project met META-Channel search project
leden van het Vaticaan waren dan geinteresseerd dat
... -Als- SETI contact maakt, welk "geloof" ET's aanhangen! ... maar ook 2000-tot nu is het Vaticaan zeer openlijk open-minded geworden ...
bedenk wel dat ZIJ zeer veel Katholieken vertegenwoordigen in de wereld (meer dan een miljard op Aarde)
hoogstwaarschijnlijk
al vanaf 1954, ook andere "Ronde Tafel" gesprekken, CFR-TC etc.
RAND-Study-Nov-1968-'UFOs_What_to_do'.pdf
diversen o.a. CSETI &
DISCLOSURE briefings aan de hele top The UFO Briefing Document - Best Available Evidence' dat in 1995 aan zo'n duizend personen wereldwijd is gestuurd en de Sturrock Workshop1997,
die beide gesponsord door miljonair Laurance Rockefeller.
Kan een DEEL van de SF-Films& tv-series ook een onderdeel zijn
van een soort mentale voorbereiding ???
even omgekeerde
"Big Brother" meemaken ? klik dan op:
iemand met een "DETECTIVE mind-set" zou dat meteen doen ...Armchair pseudo sceptici hebben hier meestal "geen zin in" of "'geen tijd voor"
"gelooft u in ..." alsof het allemaal maar "vaag" is kan het nog dommer ? of spelen ze dat ze dom zijn ? ... wat is dan erger ? Maar gelukkig zijn er steeds meer mensen in de media die WEL eerst hun huiswerk doen en daardoor intelligentere vragen gaan stellen
De Amerikaanse regering
ontkent stellig te weten van het bestaan van UFO's in de zin van buitenaards.
Dr. Brain T. Clifford of the Pentagon announced at a press conference ("The Star", New York, Oct. 5, 1982)
that contact between U.S. citizens and extra-terrestrials or their vehicles is strictly illegal. According to a law already on the books: Title 14, Section 1211 of the Code of Federal Regulations, adopted on July 16, 1969, before the Apollo moon shots, anyone guilty of such contact automatically becomes a wanted criminal to be jailed for one year and fined $5,000. The NASA administrator is empowered to determine with or without a hearing that a person or object has been "extraterrestrially exposed" and impose an indeterminate quarantine under armed guard, which could not be broken even by court order. There is no limit placed on the number of individuals who could thus be arbitrarily quarantined. The definition of "extraterrestrial exposure"
is left entirely up to NASA
administrator, which is completely contrary to the Constitution. According to Dr. Clifford, whose commanding officers have been assuring the public for the last 39 years that UFO's are nothing more than hoaxes and delusions to be dismissed with a condescending smile:
"This is really no joke, it's a very serious matter." This legislation was buried in the 1,211th subsection of the 14th section of a batch of regulations very few members of government probably bothered to read in its entirety, the proverbial needle in the haystack, and was slipped onto the books -without- public debate. Thus from one day to the next we learn that, without having informed the public, in its infinite wisdom, the government of the United States has created a whole new criminal class: UFO contactees. The lame excuse offered by NASA as a sugar coating for this bitter pill is that Extra-Terrestrials might have a virus that could wipe out the human race. This is certainly one of the many possibilities inherent is such contact, but just as certainly not the only one , and in itself not a valid reason to make all contact illegal or to declare contactees criminals to be jailed and fined immediately. It appears the primary effect of such a law would not be to prevent contact, it would be to silence witnesses. If enforced, the law would prevent publication of contactee reports except under cover of anonymity, and unleash a modern inquisition in the Land of the Free. However, it is unenforceable, so obviously absurd and unfair that the public will refuse to accept it. The citizens of the United States will greet it with a resounding Bronx cheer and laugh it out of court, forcing it to be repealed. It should be replaced by clearly worded legislation, not open to interpretation in a multitude of different ways, humanely relevant to the contingency of E.T. contact, debated and passed by Congress openly instead of slipped through "under the table" without the public being informed. According to NASA spokesman Fletcher Reel, the law as it stands is not immediately applicable, but in case of need could quickly be made applicable. What this means is that it is ambiguously worded, so that it can be interpreted either one way or the other, as the government desires. It is certainly not a coincidence that Dr. Clifford held his press conference during the period when the popularity of the film E.T. was at its peak. As E.T. portrayed a type of extraterrestrial that was benevolent and lovable, the inference is that the press conference was intended to discourage attempts to communicate or fraternize with UFO occupants. However, instead of having the intended effect, it backfired, causing public furor. There may be some relationship between this fiasco and the next semi-officially endorsed attempt to deal with the subject of extra-terrestrials, the TV film V, which was featured with repeat performances and maximum publicity by major networks worldwide. The aliens portrayed in V are the most horrifying and repulsive nightmares imaginable, who are defeated thanks largely to a CIA hit man specializing in covert operations, the tough guy with the heart of gold who with the aid of the handsome hero saves the human race. This is obvious and transparent propaganda, designed to do what the government's widespread use of dis-information, and Dr. Clifford's press conference about the absurd lemon of a law already on the books failed to do: squelch attempts to communicate or fraternize with UFO occupants. One way to avoid widespread panic at the announcement of the news that we are under surveillance by nonhuman intelligent beings with a technology far more sophisticated than our own is to point out that this situation is nothing new, but has literally been going on for millennia. If the "flying dragons" mentioned in the I Ching intended to attack and destroy us, they could easily have carried out this objective long ago. Along with this article, the text of the E.T. Law will be presented. However, there are several points that I wish to make: 1211.101 Applicability. The provisions of this part apply to all NASA manned and unmanned space missions... I could dismiss this whole controversy as a tempest in a teacup if the above passage contained the word "only", so as to read: "The provisions of this part apply only to all NASA manned and unmanned space missions..." However, it does not contain that one little word which would have made such a big difference. If the government was suddenly faced with the accomplished fact of an undeniable overt E.T. visitation, this regulation could therefore, be construed as being applicable to all space missions, NASA or non NASA, whether of terrestrial or Extra-Terrestrial origin. As it stands, this law is applicable to UFO contact. The meaning would have to be stretched, but the built-in loophole does exist. 1211.102 Definitions. (b) (2): Touched directly or been in close proximity to (or been exposed indirectly to )... Even without involved in a UFO close encounter would become eligible for indefinite quarantine under armed guard according to the above. By including indirect exposure, the NASA administrator is empowered to make the definition mean just about anything he wants it to. An example of indirect exposure is given, but an example is not a definition. Unless indirect exposure is defined precisely, it can mean almost anything. The possibility is not specifically ruled out that other types of indirect exposure than the example given might be considered valid grounds to "quarantine" a citizen or group of citizens.
for if it
is allowed to stand unchallenged, barbed wire and armed guards somewhere in Alaska.
E.T. Law, Title 14, Section 1211 of the Code of Federal Regulations (at the end of this article), to clip it out, and send it on to your congressman,with a demand penciled in, to repeal this absurd and potentially lethal law. We must use reason, and transcend fear in order to make this planet a place where all may live in peace and harmony, as One. Text of the E.T. Law Code of Federal Regulations 1211.100 Title 14 - Aeronautics and Space Part 1211 - Extra-terrestrial Exposure 1211.100 - Scope MOST of the NASA is under Military, NSA, CIA (etc.) CONTROL not by elected officials by the people!!! This part establishes: (a) NASA policy, responsibility and authority to guard the Earth against any harmful contamination or adverse changes
in its environment
resulting from personnel,
Earth after landing on or coming
within the that are necessary in the interest of national security. 1211.101 - Applicability The provisions of this part to all NASA manned and
unmanned space missions which
land or come
body and return to the Earth. and the administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration or his authorized representative. (b) "Extra-terrestrially exposed" means the state of condition of any person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever, who or which has: (1) Touched directly or come within the atmospheric envelope or any other celestial body; or (2) Touched directly or been in close proximity to (or been exposed indirectly to ) any person, property, animal or other form of life or matter who or which has been extra-terrestrially exposed by virtue of paragraph (b) (1) of this section. For example, if person or thing "A" touches the surface of the Moon, and on "A's" return to Earth, "B" touches "A" and, subsequently, "C" touches "B", all of these - "A" through "C" inclusive - would be extra-terrestrially exposed ("A" and "B" directly; "C" indirectly). (c) "Quarantine" means the detention, examination and decontamination of any persons, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever that is extra-terrestrially exposed, and includes the apprehension or seizure of such person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever. (d) "Quarantine period" means a period of consecutive calendar days as may be established in accordance with 1211.104 (a). (a) Administrative actions. The Administrator or his designee..shall in his discretion: (1) Determine the beginning and duration of a quarantine period with respect to any space mission; the quarantine period as it applies to various life forms will be announced. (2) Designate in writing quarantine officers to exercise quarantine authority. (3) Determine that a particular person, property, animal, or other form of life or matter whatever is extra- terrestrially exposed and quarantine such person, property, animal,
or other
form of life or matter whatever.
** cognizant = having knowledge or understanding, alert and fully informed, being aware of ...
(b) (4) Any person who enters the limits of any quarantine station during the quarantine period shall be deemed*** to have consented to the quarantine of his person if it is determined that he is or has become extra-terrestrially exposed. ***convey as a conviction
"reasonable opportunity" (??????????????) what about a 100% RIGHT to communicate by telephone with legal counsel ?!(a) NASA officers and employees are prohibited from discharging from the limits of a quarantine station any quarantined person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever during order or other request, order or demand an announced quarantine period in compliance with a subpoena, show cause or any court or other authority without the prior approval of the General Counsel and the Administrator. (b) Where approval to discharge a quarantined person, property, animal or other form of life or matter whatever in compliance with such a request, order or demand of any court or other authority is not given, the person to whom it is directed shall, if possible, appear in court or before the other authority and respectfully state his inability to comply, relying for his action on this 1211.107. 1211.108 Violations: Whoever willfully violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate any provision of this part or any regulation or order issued under this part or who enters or departs from the limits of a quarantine station in disregard of the quarantine rules or regulations or without permission of the NASA quarantine officer shall be fined not more that $5,000* or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
This article was printed in The Open Line Newspaper (Environmental Stewards)
You may distribute, make available for study, give out this text freely !!!
cause to become widely known
... we have a right2know !
CSETI & Disclosureproject fragment: Begin 1993 begon ik een onderzoek naar eerstehands getuigen va UFO gebeurtenissen en projecten binnen het militaire apparaat en de regering en ook naar andere getuigenissen die geheim werden gehouden. Vanaf 1993 besteedden we veel tijd en geld aan het horen en rapporteren van de Clinton Administratie, waaronder de CIA directeur James Woolsey, belangrijke gepensioneerde militairen op het Pentagon en speciale leden van het Congres. In april 1997 werden talrijke getuigen uit de regering en het militaire apparaat bijeengebracht in Washington DC om te worden ondervraagd door leden van het Congres, belangrijke vertegenwoordigers van het Pentagon en anderen. Op dit punt verzochten wij de congresleden dringend deze zaak in een open hoorzitting te onderzoeken. Hier kwam niets van terecht.
willen of kunnen informeren over UFO's & de "ufonauten"* ?' * ufonauten KUNNEN o.a. ET's zijn maar ook "Interdimensionals" of "tijdreizigers uit de toekomst" of "Atlantiers/Mu",of van diverse geheime ondergrondse & onderwater basis wereldwijd ... etc. ---o-0-o--- “Er bestaat een schaduwregering met een eigen luchtmacht, zeemacht, financieringsmechanisme en het vermogen de eigen ideeën van nationale belangen te volgen, vrij van controle en wetten” Senator Daniel K. Inouve
Deze kritiek en deze belachelijkheid hebben meer dan iets
British Ministry of Defense Official (DoD or MoD)
en zeker de particuliere
onderzoekers,
politici en wat dan ook.
|
Hardnekkig "UFO-sprookje" in de Mainstream-Media onthuld!
sprookjes hebben alleen effect als mensen ze willen
geloven
+ UFO-pseudo-sceptici te checken & onderzoeken en er ook nog iets aan gaan doen. zoals bijvoorbeeld CE-2 en CE-4 gevallen
Waarom niemand inhoudelijk
in gaat
op de
80.000+ officiële (verjaarde) Declassified Top Secret CIA-FBI-NSA-ONI Navy -
USAF-NORAD-Britse-Spaanse-Italiaanse etc.
MILITAIRE UFO-Documenten diverse landen:
zie o.a.
www.caus.org -
www.blackvault.com &
www.disclosureproject.org
die echt VRIJ zijn, en zich LOS kunnen rukken van het "wat men vindt" en de gedachten-politie: "wat anderen zouden --kunnen-- denken" ...
hopelijk daardoor meer intelligentere UFO-vragen gaat stellen ...
dus
niet meer "gelooft u in... ??? ..."
wat is erger ?
en nog veel meer willen- weten ...
een UFO gezien, die ik niet thuis kan brengen" bestaan ze daarom niet ? waarom bestaat Japan ? (ben je er wel geweest ?) je zegt toch ook niet na ALLE indirecte bewijzen,
dat je wel "gelooft" dat Japan bestaat ...
je ---weet--- het !
iets vreemds wordt 'altijd' geïdentificeerd."
"WHAT SHOULD WE PREPARE FOR?" ASK AMERICAN FIRE FIGHTERS
What Should We Prepare For?
recommends that the French government reflect on "the measures to take in the event of a spectacular þand indisputable manifestation of a UFO."
Surprisingly, the United States has taken one small step in that direction. The second edition of the Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control is currently used for training by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) at its National Fire Academy and is taught nationally through the seven universities offering degrees in fire science.
Chapter 13 of the guide is titled "Enemy Attack and UFO Potential."
It warns fire fighters of known "UFO
hazards" such as electrical fields that cause blackouts, air and ground travel disruptions by force
fields, and physiological effects.
Internetondernemer en multi-miljonair Joe Firmage besteedt vermogen
|
National & World Security Protocols
A more viable
and logical process would be as follows:
1) To identify potentially benevolent ET species or
groups.
2) Establish mutual communication and understanding.
3) Develop alliance with identified elements of a positive nature.
4) Utilize guidance, knowledge, and group alliance for the betterment and
overall protection Earth and Mankind as a whole.
This has been suggested by us in
private
'think-tank' discussions at
high levels,
and was received amazingly well as demonstrated by
Kit Green's (former CIA UFO Dept. Head)
comment of, "I whole heartedly agree with these most
eloquent words."
Ultimately this has all led to the undertaking of our
"Project Contact" http://psi-app.com/project.htm
which sets out to
achieve the foundations of those goals.
Project Contact 'Initiatives' are
undertaken in contact cases where a pre-screening for benevolence is met, and
current ongoing events are occurring. Though we do not initially discount a
contactee's telepathic connection in such events, protocols
are
eventually aimed to establish the initiatives 'documented contact' by external
technological means. This will eliminate the human
psychological component, as a considered variable, in demonstrating 2 way cooperative
dialog and communications with ET or UTI beings !!!
Now on to the document!
http://psi-app.com/whole_enchilada2.html
To Truth & Advancement Steve Moreno Founder & Managing Director
Declaration of Principles
Concerning Activities Following the Detection of
Extraterrestrial Intelligence
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We, the institutions and individuals participating in the search for
extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI),
Recognizing that the search for extraterrestrial intelligence is an integral
part of space exploration and is being undertaken for peaceful purposes and for
the common interest of all mankind,
Inspired by the profound significance for mankind of detecting evidence of
extraterrestrial intelligence, even though the probability of detection may be
low,
Recalling the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the
Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial
Bodies, which commits States Parties to that Treaty "to inform the Secretary
General of the United Nations as well as the public and the international
scientific community, to the greatest extent feasible and practicable, of the
nature, conduct, locations and results" of their space exploration activities
(Article XI),
Recognizing that any initial detection may be incomplete or ambiguous and thus
require careful examination as well as confirmation, and that it is essential to
maintain the highest standards of scientific responsibility and credibility,
Agree to observe the following principles for disseminating information about
the detection of extraterrestrial intelligence:
Any individual, public or private research institution, or governmental agency
that believes it has detected a signal from or other evidence of
extraterrestrial intelligence (the discoverer) should seek to verify that the
most plausible explanation for the evidence is the existence of extraterrestrial
intelligence rather than some other natural phenomenon or anthropogenic
phenomenon before making any public announcement. If the evidence cannot be
confirmed as indicating the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence, the
discoverer may disseminate the information as appropriate to the discovery of
any unknown phenomenon.
Prior to making a public announcement that evidence of extraterrestrial
intelligence has been detected, the discoverer should promptly inform all other
observers or research organizations that are parties to this declaration, so
that those other parties may seek to confirm the discovery by independent
observations at other sites and so that a network can be established to enable
continuous monitoring of the signal or phenomenon. Parties to this declaration
should not make any public announcement of this information until it is
determined whether this information is or is not credible evidence of the
existence of extraterrestrial intelligence. The discoverer should inform his/her
or its relevant national authorities.
After concluding that the discovery appears to be credible evidence of
extraterrestrial intelligence, and after informing other parties to this
declaration, the discoverer should inform observers throughout the world through
the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams of the International Astronomical
Union, and should inform the Secretary General of the United Nations in
accordance with Article XI of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities
of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and
Other Bodies. Because of their demonstrated interest in and expertise concerning
the question of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence, the discoverer
should simultaneously inform the following international institutions of the
discovery and should provide them with all pertinent data and recorded
information concerning the evidence: the International Telecommunication Union,
the Committee on Space Research, of the International Council of Scientific
Unions, the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of
Astronautics, the International Institute of Space Law, Commission 51 of the
International Astronomical Union and Commission J of the International Radio
Science Union.
A confirmed detection of extraterrestrial intelligence should be disseminated
promptly, openly, and widely through scientific channels and public media,
observing the procedures in this declaration. The discoverer should have the
privilege of making the first public announcement.
All data necessary for confirmation of detection should be made available to the
international scientific community through publications, meetings, conferences,
and other appropriate means.
The discovery should be confirmed and monitored and any data bearing on the
evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be recorded and stored
permanently to the greatest extent feasible and practicable, in a form that will
make it available for further analysis and interpretation. These recordings
should be made available to the international institutions listed above and to
members of the scientific community for further objective analysis and
interpretation.
If the evidence of detection is in the form of electromagnetic signals, the
parties to this declaration should seek international agreement to protect the
appropriate frequencies by exercising procedures available through the
International Telecommunication Union. Immediate notice should be sent to the
Secretary General of the ITU in Geneva, who may include a request to minimize
transmissions on the relevant frequencies in the Weekly Circular. The
Secretariat, in conjunction with advice of the Union's Administrative Council,
should explore the feasibility and utility of convening an Extraordinary
Administrative Radio Conference to deal with the matter, subject to the opinions
of the member Administrations of the ITU.
No response to a signal or other evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence
should be sent until appropriate international consultations have taken place.
The procedures for such consultations will be the subject of a separate
agreement, declaration or arrangement.
The SETI Committee of the International Academy of Astronautics, in coordination
with Commission 51 of the International Astronomical Union, will conduct a
continuing review of procedures for the detection of extraterrestrial
intelligence and the subsequent handling of the data. Should credible evidence
of extraterrestrial intelligence be discovered, an international committee of
scientists and other experts should be established to serve as a focal point for
continuing analysis of all observational evidence collected in the aftermath of
the discovery, and also to provide advice on the release of information to the
public. This committee should be constituted from representatives of each of the
international institutions listed above and such other members as the committee
may deem necessary. To facilitate the convocation of such a committee at some
unknown time in the future, the SETI Committee of the International Academy of
Astronautics should initiate and maintain a current list of willing
representatives from each of the international institutions listed above, as
well as other individuals with relevant skills, and should make that list
continuously available through the Secretariat of the International Academy of
Astronautics. The International Academy of Astronautics will act as the
Depository for this declaration and will annually provide a current list of
parties to all the parties to this declaration.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Information:
Documents Regarding the Detection of Extraterrestrial Intelligence
Cover Letter for These Documents
IAA Position Paper: A Decision Process for Examining the Possibility of Sending
Communications to Extraterrestrial Civilizations
Declaration of Principles Concerning Activities Following the Detection of
Extraterrestrial Intelligence
Draft Declaration of Principles Concerning the Sending of Communications to
Extraterrestrial Intelligence Under construction
Other Information:
Executive Summary of a Workshop on the Cultural Aspects of SETI Possible
Societal Effects
SETI Science SETI Institute - 2035 Landings Drive -
Mountain View, CA 94043 (650) 961-6633
E.T. Law, Title 14, Section 1211 of the Code of Federal:
.gif)
E.T. Law, Title 14, Section 1211 of the Code of Federal
COMETA UFO Report (France)
http://exopolitics.com/
The following is an unedited version of journalist Leslie Kean's article on the
3-year
French COMETA study on UFO/ET, posted with her permission on UFOUpdates.
Her landmark article appeared, in edited versions in the Boston Globe, Irish
Times, and VSD (France).
June 2000 USA: UFOs
& NATIONAL SECURITY
By
Leslie Kean
Leslie Kean is a TRUE journalist that konows HOW to make a HONEST reliable summarization:
Brief account that presents the main points in a concise form !!!
WAKE UP MAINSTREAM MEDIA!
[From VSD: The recent diffusion in the United States of the Cometa report
generates multiple reactions starting from politicians from
Congress and military men from the Pentagon. Leslie Kean, an American
journalist, examines the situation.]
COMETA spokesperson Michel Algrin says that the report was delivered to French
president
Jacques Chirac and Prime Minister Lionel Jospin. "No response is
awaited, only action," he says.
"The COMETA made no request to the US government. It is not entitled to do so,"
says Algrin, an attorney and political scientist.
"But, in its report, it recommended to the French government to seek for a
cooperation [sic] with its American ally on the subject of UFOs."
Dr. Edgar Mitchell, the
Apollo 14 astronaut who was the sixth man to walk on the moon, is one of many
supporters of such cooperation. "It's significant that individuals of some
standing in the government, military and intelligence community in France came
forth with this," he said in a recent interview from his home in Florida.
Mitchell, who holds a doctor of science degree from MIT, is convinced "at a
confidence level above 90%, that there is reality to all of this."
He joins five-star Admiral Lord Hill-Norton, the former head of the British
Ministry of Defense and Major Gordon L. Cooper, one of America's original seven
Mercury astronauts, in calling for Congressional fact-finding hearings into the
UFO question. "People have been digging through the files and investigating for
years now. The files are quite convincing. The only thing that's lacking is the
official stamp," Mitchell says.
Despite the fact that Mitchell is a national hero and has been honored with the
Presidential Medal of Freedom, the USN Distinguished Service Medal and the NASA
Distinguished Service Medal, his request for an investigation has been ignored
by U.S. officials.
As the COMETA report points out, the U.S. is unique in its silence on this
issue. UFOs and Defense notes that many
UFO files are classified Above Top
Secret,
and accuses the U.S. of following a
policy of disinformation.
It says that the
government has an "impressive repressive arsenal" in place,
which includes
military regulations prohibiting public disclosure of UFO sightings.
Air Force Regulation 200-2, ``Unidentified Flying Objects
Reporting,''
for example, prohibits the release to the public and the media of any data about
``those objects which are not explainable.''
An even more restrictive procedure is outlined in the
Joint Army Navy Air Force Publication 146,
which threatens to prosecute anyone under its jurisdiction - including pilots,
civilian agencies, merchant marine captains, and even some fishing vessels -
for disclosing reports
of sightings relevant to US security.
Although some documentation has been released through the
Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA), researchers have had an increasingly difficult time
accessing information about a subject that the U.S. government claims does not
exist.
A 1980 federal suit is a case in point. The case was filed in the US District Court of the District of Columbia against the National Security Agency (NSA) for 156 UFO documents the agency refused to release.
The NSA
provided U.S. District Court Judge Gerhard A.Gesell
with a 21-page, Above Top Secret affidavit justifying the withholding.
No one
else was permitted to see the affidavit.
Affidavit = written declaration made under oath; a written statement sworn to be true before someone
legally authorized to administer an oath
The judge dismissed the lawsuit stating that "public interest in disclosure is
far outweighed by the sensitive nature of the materials and the obvious effect
on national security their release may entail."
MILITARY CLOSE ENCOUNTERS
A few months after the French release of the COMETA report,
U.S. Naval Reserve Commander Willard H. Miller agreed to go on the record about
his participation in a series of previously undisclosed briefings for Pentagon brass
about:
National Security and Military Policy regarding UFOs !
Commander Willard H. Miller has been a key liaison to the Pentagon on the subject for years.
"It's time to give some credibility to the fact that there are those in high places in the government who have an interest in this subject,"
he says, taking a considerable risk by
coming forward.
Miller retired in 1994 from active duty on the Current Operations Staff (J3) of
U.S. Atlantic Command, Norfolk,
Virginia where he worked operations, intelligence, and special contingency
issues.
With over 30 years of experience in Navy and Joint Interagency operations with the Department of Defense,
Commander Miller has held a Top
Secret clearance with access to sensitive compartmented information.
It has not been easy for Miller to overcome the taboo that the UFO subject
carries among his colleagues in the military.
"It is treated much the way we
used to view mental illness. Hide the crazy daughter in the attic," he says.
In a February, 2000 confidential memo titled:
"Selected Discussions with Key United States (US) Department of Defense (DoD)
Intelligence Personnel on the Subject of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs)
and Extraterrestrial Intelligence (ETI)" prepared for this reporter,
Miller spelled out the details of meetings between 1989 and 2000
with named high level Department of Defense intelligence personnel -
including the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA),
an Admiral on the Joint Staff, and the U.S. Atlantic Command Director for Intelligence - among others.
Miller says he initiated briefings "to provide the flag officers with information to help the
military decision-making processes when these unexplained craft are encountered
by members of the Department of
Defense."
Concerned that many high-ranking military officers are not properly informed
about the UFO phenomenon,
Miller believes that the generals who have come forward in France could have a significant impact.
"Without preparation and planning for encounters, precipitous military decisions may lead to
unnecessary
confusion, misapplication of forces, or possible catastrophic consequences," he
says..
The Navy Commander's concern is justified by the historical record.
Declassified government documents show that unexplained objects with extraordinary technical capabilities pose challenges to military activity around the globe.
U.S. fighter jets have been scrambled to pursue UFOs, according to
North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) logs
and U.S. Air Force documents.
Peruvian and Iranian Air Force planes attempted to shoot down unexplained objects during air encounters,
and Belgium F-16's equipped with automatically guided missiles pursued UFO's in 1990.
(UFO jumped OUT of the LOCK-ON
!!!)
In earlier decades, such concerns were openly discussed among American
government officials.
In 1960, for example, Representative Leonard G. Wolf of Iowa entered an "urgent warning" from
former CIA Director Vice Admiral R.E. Hillenkoetter into the Congressional Record that
"certain dangers are linked with unidentified flying objects."
Wolf cited General L.M. Chassin, NATO coordinator of Allied Air Service,
warning that "if we persist in refusing to recognize the existence of the UFOs,
we will end up, one fine day, by mistaking them for the guided missiles of an enemy -
and the worst will be upon
us."
Representative Leonard G. Wolf of
Iowa
ALSO referenced a three-year study which determined that
air defense scrambles and alerts had already occurred due to the presence of UFOs.
All defense personnel "should be told that UFOs are real and should be trained to distinguish them
- by their characteristic speeds and maneuvers - from
conventional planes and missiles" the study said.
These concerns were taken seriously enough to be incorporated into the 1971
"Agreement on Measures to Reduce the Outbreak of Nuclear War" between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
(John F. Kennedy asked for this Agreement on Measures CIA-Nasa-USSR-UN 10 days before he was shot dead !!!)
The treaty states that the two countries will "notify each other immediately in the event of detection by
missile warning systems of
unidentified objects...if such occurrences could create a risk
of outbreak of nuclear war between the two countries."
The
COMETA assures its readers that UFOs have not been
the cause of any hostile acts "although intimidation maneuvers have been
confirmed." In France, they say, there have been "visits above secret
installations and missile bases" and "military aircraft shadowed" by UFOs.
Like Miller, they warn against impulsive, uninformed actions.
"In the face of an unknown situation, one must be on guard against any instinctive
self-defense reaction that could be
easily interpreted as a provocation."
Reports such as the one from France may open the door for the U.S. and other
nations to be more forthcoming.
Chile Air Force, for example, is openly addressing it's own concerns about Air Safety and UFOs.
The now retired
Chief of the
Chilean
Air Force has
formed a committee with
military and civil aviation experts
to study recent near
collisions between UFOs and
civilian airliners.
GOVERNMENT WITNESSES:
EXTRAORDINARY AND UNAMBIGUOUS EVENTS
While Commander Miller alerted the Pentagon,
researcher Dr. Steven M. Greer was working the issue within the U.S.Congress and the executive branch.
Greer, an emergency physician who has assembled government documents,
visual evidence and
credible witness reports on UFOs, ALSO attended some of the Pentagon briefings
with Miller.
In 1993, Greer was invited to meet with President Clinton's first sitting CIA
Director, Admiral James Woolsey.
The three hour event was arranged by futurist John L. Petersen,
President and founder of the Washington area "think tank" The Arlington Institute,
who "specializes in the area of national and global security" and currently serves as a Pentagon consultant, according to Institute materials.
Petersen's credentials include stints at the Office of the Secretary
of Defense and the National Security Council staff.
Petersen declined to answer questions concerning his purpose in hosting the
dinner meeting at his home in Arlington, Virginia.
However, he obviously was aware of the high stakes involved.
In a sensitive memo he sent to Greer just prior to the meeting, he said that the dinner with Woolsey would
"move the whole
thing to a much, much higher plane..." and that "the most powerful people
in the world will have a deep, compelling interest in our activities..."
At the same time, he pointed out that the meeting - kept secret until 1998 -
would
raise "significant red flags for those who don't want to see this succeed."
Greer says he only needed 15 minutes to present CIA Director
Woolsey with the documentation he brought in a large briefcase.
CIA Director Woolsey was already convinced as to the reality of UFO's.
Most of the meeting was spent discussing "what all of this means" and
"the
geopolitical implications of disclosing this matter fully to the public," Greer
says
In August 1995, philanthropist Laurance Rockefeller provided Greer's briefing
materials to President Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Presidential science
advisor Jack Gibbons while they spent a weekend at Rockefellers' Wyoming ranch.
Clinton then instructed Associate Attorney General at the Justice Department,
Webster Hubbell, to investigate the existence of UFOs, as disclosed in his book Friends in High Places.
Despite
this request from the Commander-in-Chief, Hubbell
was unable to obtain
information on the subject.
Greer has worked tirelessly in an effort to bring about Congressionsal hearings
into the UFO question.
He has earned the trust of over 400 government witnesses with personal,
first-hand knowledge of UFO phenomena and related projects who are committed to testify under oath.
These witnesses made their observations while in the Air Force, Army, Navy, NASA,
private industry and intelligence operations.
According to Greer, they are waiting only for Congressional subpoenas to protect them from
penalties for violating national security oaths
before coming forward.
Apollo Astronaut Edgar Mitchell has talked to a number of these witnesses.
"They
have stated their first hand experience with conviction and their stories check
out," he said. Coupled with the new military disclosures acknowledging national
security concerns, advocates for Congressional hearings
believe that the testimonies of these highly credible government witnesses could
force, once and for all, a government examination of the "extra-terrestrial
hypothesis" as has been done in France.
As a small prelude to these hearings, eleven witnesses risked coming forward
"for ethical, moral and patriotic reasons" as Greer explained it. On April 9,
1997, Greer and his associates held an unprecedented, confidential congressional
briefing at the Westin Hotel in Washington. The VIP's in attendance included
Representative Dan Burton, Chair of the House Committee on Government Reform and
Oversight, with his chief of staff, and staffers from nearly thirty
congressional offices. Representatives from the executive branch, including a
staff member from Vice President Gore's office, were present, along with
representatives of two state governors, the Department of Defense, and the
scientific community.
Greer told the attendees that the witnesses "have directly handled this subject
or have been present while it was occuring - major events, unambiguous events,
not a light in the sky, but extroardinary events" and "are tremendously
dedicated to trying to bring this forward to the public."
For over one and a half hours, participants heard from a Pentagon cryptologist
who said he viewed extraterrestrial space debris containing indecipherable
writing, and a NASA subcontracter who saw restricted satellite photos showing
flying discs that were routinely airbrushed out before public release.
A Navy
pilot and his crew experienced electromagnetic effects in their airplane when a
300 foot UFO flew 25 miles in two seconds directly in front of the plane, as
confirmed by Gander radar and official government documents.
Witnesses touched on national security concerns such as those brought to the
Pentagon by Commander Miller. Loring Air Force base was visited by a silent
triangular ship which hovered over B-52's on strategic alert.
A senior admiral, amid command center chaos, issued a "force down" order against an
elliptical-shaped craft of unknown origin, tracked by satellite, radar, and chased by military planes.
According to the witness, it literally jumped between
states in under a minute, flew out to sea and suddenly left the earth's
atmosphere.
By all accounts, the VIP's present paid close attention. They had been clearly
informed that these witnesses were only the tip of the iceberg out of a pool of
more than 100. "This is a subject that can either bore you to death or shock you
to death or absolutely leave you speechless" witness Major Steven Lovekin told
them.
A veteran Congressional staffer received a standing ovation when, unsolicited,
she took the floor and declared her determination to bring this information to
the public by organizing for hearings on capitol hill. The next day, Miller,
Lovekin, Mitchell and Greer brought the same information to the Joint Staff Vice
Director for Intelligence at a private Pentagon briefing.
PROTECTING HARD-EARNED REPUTATIONS
Two years after the Washington briefing, the COMETA released its dramatic report
which ended by stating that "only increasing pressure from public opinion,
possibly supported by the results of independent researchers, by more or less
calculated disclosures, or by a sudden rise in UFO manifestations might perhaps
induce U.S. leaders and persons of authority to change their stance."
Witness
testimonies and other evidence presented in 1997 did not seem to create movement
in that direction.
"Because the Congress is afraid they won't get re- elected, they don't even want
to talk about this.
I just think somebody should do something," says the
Congressional staffer who is working for hearings behind the scenes.
When Representative Burton left the Westin Hotel that night, he requested that
all information on the subject be sent to his office. Yet a recent inquiry to
Burton's office revealed that whatever interest the Congressman may have shown
will not bear fruit until the demand for hearings - from both the press and the
public - escalates. "We haven't heard a very loud call for hearings on this
issue yet," said press secretary John Williams.
"As far as any intention of holding hearings regarding the existence of UFOs or
anything that pertained to that briefing,
we have no intention of holding any hearings on that right now."
Williams stated that Burton's interest in the
subject is purely personal.
Some representatives are interested, but only behind closed doors, says a
democratic campaign manager, requesting anonymity, who has been intimately
involved in electoral politics for 29 years. He has met personally with a number
of members of congress on the subject. "With our thirty second commercials'
ability to destroy hard-earned reputations, particularly using a subject like
this, people are very hesitant to take a leading role on the subject, although
they know that it's a very real matter," he says.
Nonetheless, one congressman did respond to public pressure. In 1993, New Mexico
representative Steven Schiff requested that the General Accounting Office
investigate the infamous 1947 crash of a mysterious object in the desert near
Roswell, New Mexico. Two
years later, he learned from the GAO that all documents and radio messages
during the relevant time period had been destroyed "without proper authority."
Schiff was unable to attend the Washington briefing in 1997 and died of an
aggressive skin cancer the following year. No other member has picked up where
he left off.
Dr. Greer, who has privately briefed both Representative
Christopher Cox and Senator Richard Bryan of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
is asking supporters to apply pressure.
Missouri, the "Show Me" state, has become the first to launch a ballot
initiative urging Congress to convene hearings in which government witnesses can
testify "regarding their personal knowledge of any UFO-related evidence."
Certified by the Missouri secretary of state in March, the initiative states
that "the Federal Government's handling of the UFO issue has contributed to the
public cynicism toward, and general mistrust of, government - a development
injurious to our republic."
Robert Bletchman, a Connecticut attorney who conceived of the initiative, has no
doubt it would win votes in the November election, as long as the requisite
number of signatures are collected in time.
"My expectation is that Missouri will kindle a firestorm of proactive interest throughout the country in those sixteen states that allow for the direct initiative," he says. Hundreds of thousands of votes would be involved.
"What does Congress pay attention to? How real people at the ballot box actually vote," Bletchman says.
"Maybe for the
first time the
politicians would have to pay overt attention."
THE REAL NATIONAL SECURITY
THREAT
On September 15, 1998, Commander Willard Miller and
Dr. Steven Greer entered the Pentagon through the VIP entrance.
After passing through metal detectors, they were escorted past armed security guards, up the massive staircase and into the innermost ring of the Pentagon.
An electrically controlled door brought them
into the comfortable outer office of the Director of the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA), adorned with mahogany, walnut, brass, and
military plaques.
Thirty minutes later, the DIA Director came out of his inner chamber, parting
company with an entourage of high-level foreign Admirals and generals. He
graciously ushered in his two guests, taking his place at the head of a massive
wood table.
According to Miller's confidential memo of February 2000, an Army
Colonel, a DIA staff member and a Defense Department clerk were ALSO seated
around the table. The briefing lasted 50 minutes.
Greer provided the military officials with declassified documents from the CIA,
DIA, FBI, NORAD, SAC (Strategic Air Command) and NMCC (National Military Command
Center), referencing specific UFO events connected with military forces and
bases.
At the general's request,
he provided a "comprehensive overview"
of the
subject.
Commander Miller's Military Information Outline prepared for the briefing
included a discussion of national security
implications, military risks and recommended courses of action.
Greer and Miller explained to the DIA Director that there is no credible evidence of hostility from UFO occupants.
"The only threat to the national security of the United States is the continued denial of undeniable physical UFO occurrences and sightings to a public growing increasingly frustrated with its government's weak explanations,"
Miller says he told the Pentagon officials. "Some US Air Force
denials defy logic and strain the public's tolerance,
he said.
His point was dramatically illustrated in the aftermath of an extraordinary
event that occurred one spring evening over the state of Arizona.
On March 13, 1997, thousands observed enormous, lighted, triangular craft flying low and silently, sometimes hovering wingless over populated areas. Hundreds of feet long, air traffic controllers failed to register them on radar.
To this day, the
people of Arizona do not know what penetrated US airspace that night.
In response to public demand, Phoenix city council member Frances Barwood
initiated an investigation into the Arizona triangles.
"I like answers. I don't
like unfinished business. People need to push their elected officials
to find
out what is invading our air space," she says. Barwood says she personally spoke
with over seven hundred people who saw the objects.
She was never provided any reasonable explanation. Instead, the councilwoman was
given the run-around from her city, state and federal government - including
Arizona Senator John McCain - and was publicly ridiculed by the mayor of
Phoenix. Yet she still considers this "an issue of state and national
significance." Barwood has retired from politics to write a book about this
experience.
"The fact that the government never interviewed one witness doesn't
make me feel too secure about our national security," she commented during a
recent interview.
Arizona attorney Peter Gersten responded by filing a
Freedom of Information Act
lawsuit against the Department of Defense in 1999. The case
challenged the
adequacy of the governments "reasonable search" for information about the
triangular objects seen over Arizona in 1997, and elsewhere in the US over the
last twenty years.
As recently as January 5, 2000, four policemen
at different locations in St.
Claire County, Illinois, witnessed a brightly lit, huge triangular craft flying
at 1000 feet, according to the Los Angeles Times. Most alarming was the report
from Lebanon police officer Thomas Barton that he witnessed the hovering object
jump at least 8 miles in 3 seconds.
Aeronautical expert Paul Czysz, who spent 29
years at McDonnell-Douglas designing faster-than-sound aircraft, says that such
rapid motion cannot be explained in conventional terms. The object would be a
"fireball" and "people on board would be mush," he says. Yet nearby Scott Air
Force base and the FAA purport to know nothing
On February 29, 2000, a reporter brought the issue of military denial and the
Arizona lawsuit to the attention of U.S. Senator John McCain of Arizona at a
California press conference. "I think it's of great interest," responded the
Presidential candidate, acknowledging that the 1997 "lights" seen over Arizona
have "never been fully explained."
Nonetheless, the DoD continues to maintain that it can find no information about
the triangular objects. It provided details of its search to the court as
required by U.S. District Court Stephen M. McNamee of Phoenix for Gersten's
lawsuit.
On March 30, 2000, the judge concluded that "a reasonable search was
conducted' even though no information was obtained, and he dismissed the case. (VERY STRANGE!)
Like Barwood, Gersten is incredulous. "What is it that has unlimited,
unrestricted access to our airspace in populated areas?" he says. "With so many
worries about terrorist attacks, how could they not know what these triangles
are?"
The danger of such blatant denial is what Navy Commander Willard Miller brought
to the attention of the three star general from the Defense Intelligence Agency
that day in 1998. Miller told him that the continued denial of information
"causes the public to begin to loose additional faith in the military and the
government. That's not good for the country.
That type of non- response
threatens the stability, trust and fabric of an open democratic society," he
said.
Miller and Greer left the DIA director with a multi-volume package of briefing
materials and
video documentation which had been prepared for the Washington
briefing in 1997.
Once again, the French generals make the same point raised by their American
counterparts.
"How can one try to ignore a phenomena that is manifested by the regular crossing of our air space by moving objects...
If we do nothing, the very
principle of defense and air intelligence would be called into question," they
state.
According to Miller, all of the high-ranking military officers at the briefings
showed "a great amount of inquisitiveness (curiousness)."
There was little laughter. "The
briefings were accorded the same serious attention given to other briefings on
national security matters," says Miller.
He has yet to assess, however, whether
he achieved the desired effect of transforming military policy towards UFO
encounters and response to public inquiries.
"UFO's, WHAT SHOULD WE PREPARE FOR?"
ASK THE AMERICAN
F.E.M.A. INSTRUCTED
FIRE FIGHTERS !
UFOs and Defense,
What Should We Prepare
For?
recommends that the French government
reflect on "the measures to take in the event of a spectacular
and indisputable manifestation of a
UFO."
Surprisingly, the United States FEMA has taken ALSO a small step in that direction !!!
The second edition of the Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control is currently used for training by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) at its National Fire Academy and is taught nationally through the seven universities offering degrees in fire science.
Chapter 13 of the National Fire Academy guide is titled "Enemy Attack and UFO Potential."
It warns fire fighters of known "UFO hazards" such as electrical fields that cause blackouts, air and
ground travel disruptions by force
fields, and physiological effects.
"Do not stand under a UFO that is hovering at low altitudes.
Do not touch or attempt to touch a UFO
that has landed," the book warns.
Researched primarily by now deceased US Naval Reserve Captain Charles Bahme,
a
Los Angeles deputy fire chief who ALSO worked for the
Department of Defense
(DoD) and
the U.S. State Department, the chapter describes the role that fire fighters
should play "in the event of the unexpected arrival of UFOs in their
communities."
As an example, it outlines a scenario of a UFO crashing into the boiler room of a school, where the spilled oil ignites, endangering the lives of those inside the craft. The fire officials are instructed to let the military take over. Dr. William M. Kramer, professor of Fire Science at the University of Cincinnati and an Ohio Fire Chief, co- authored the chapter and will be updating it this year.
Dr. William M. Kramer, says that "the vast majority of fire fighters believe very definitely that UFOs are
genuinely unidentifiable craft and are
not natural phenomena native to our known earth and our known
existence." Like most people,
they are reluctant to admit this publicly.
The French Institute of Higher Studies for National Defense and the National Center for Space Studies
are a few steps ahead of the United States military and NASA.
Not only do they openly present information acknowledging the existence of UFOs and attempt to explain their origin, they ALSO recommend a widespread information and training campaign on preparedness which would reach all sectors of the relevant political, military, and civilian spectrum in their country.
Perhaps the report by the bold French generals - with its goal of "stripping the
phenomenon of UFOs of its irrational layer" -
will be a catalyst for American
authorities to examine the issue of UFO's in a new light.
============================================
Posted on UFOUpdates with permission of Leslie Kean by
Giuliano Marinkovicc (Croatia, Europe,
ICQ UIN #67412597, tel:+385-23-430-970)
UFO News Co-ordinator
The UFO Enigma on Destination:
Space - www.destinationspace.net
UFO UpDates - Toronto - updates@sympatico.ca
A UFO & Related Phenomena E-Mail List operated
by Errol Bruce-Knapp
UFO UpDates Archives are available at:
http://ufomind.com/ufo/updates
In the ensuing
decades, SETI grew from a lone wolf project to an effort involving a worldwide
pack of scientists. Realizing that finding a signal would, of course, happen
unexpectedly, the researchers decided that it would be a good idea to formulate
a plan of "what to do next."
And formulate they did. Most of the sweat equity was contributed by John
Billingham and Jill Tarter
http://space.com/peopleinterviews/tarter_profile_991112.html
(now at the SETI Institute) together with Michael Michaud (currently retired),
together with their colleagues on the SETI Committee of the International
Academy of Astronautics (IAA). In 1989, they submitted to the academy a short
document with a long title:
"A Declaration of Principles Concerning Activities Following the Detection of
Extraterrestrial Intelligence." It was an action plan in case a signal was
found.
Although approved by the IAA and a gush of other space and astronomy groups, the
declaration is really only a gentlemen’s agreement. It has no force of law --
after all, who could or would enforce it? On the other hand, all the major SETI
research teams have said they will abide by it if their telescopes pick up a
faint buzz from space. The contents of the declaration are all maternity and
apple pie: check the signal to be sure that it’s truly extraterrestrial, then
notify the astronomical community, the government and the public (the order is
unspecified).
Check It Out The "Declaration of Principles" can be found at SETI"s website .
In other words -- no secrecy. That may sound like a no-brainer, but in the past
some astronomical discoveries have been kept secret, at least for a while. When
pulsars were first found by English astronomers in 1967, there was confusion
about what they were. Initially dubbing their discovery LGMs, for Little Green
Men, the astronomers considered, semi-seriously, that they might have tripped
upon alien broadcasts. Months passed, and only when it became clear that a
natural explanation for the pulsing signals was in the offing did the
astronomers make their find public. The declaration makes
it clear that, in the case of a real LGM signal, the world should be told. And
for reasons we’ll discuss next time, this not only makes sense, but in fact
can’t happen any other way. Agent Mulder might be able to keep his
investigations under wraps, but SETI research is as open as the Great Plains. If the astronomers hear a signal, you’ll be hearing from the
astronomers.
Declaration of Principles Concerning Activities
Following the Detection
of Extraterrestrial Intelligence !
We, the institutions and individuals participating
in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, recognizing that the search for
Extraterrestrial intelligence is an integral part of space exploration and is
being undertaken for peaceful purposes and for the common interest of all
mankind,
Inspired by the profound significance for mankind of detecting evidence of
extraterrestrial intelligence, even though the probability of detection may be
low,
Recalling the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the
Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial
Bodies, which commits States Parties to that Treaty "to inform the Secretary
General of the United Nations as well as the public and the international
scientific community, to the greatest extent feasible and practicable, of the
nature, conduct, locations and results" of their space exploration activities
(Article XI),
Recognizing that any initial detection may be incomplete or ambiguous and thus
require careful examination as well as confirmation, and that it is essential to
maintain the highest standards of scientific responsibility and credibility,
Agree to observe the following principles for disseminating information about
the detection of extraterrestrial intelligence:
01. Any individual, public or private
research institution, or governmental agency that believes it has detected a
signal from or other evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence (the discoverer)
should seek to verify that the most plausible explanation for the evidence is
the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence rather than some other natural
phenomenon or anthropogenic phenomenon before making any public announcement. If
the evidence cannot be confirmed as indicating the existence of extraterrestrial
intelligence, the discoverer may disseminate the information as appropriate to
the discovery of any unknown phenomenon.
02. Prior to making a public announcement
that evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence has been detected, the discoverer
should promptly inform all other observers or research organizations that are
parties to this declaration, so that those other parties may seek to confirm the
discovery by independent observations at other sites and so that a network can
be established to enable continuous monitoring of the signal or phenomenon.
Parties to this declaration should not make any public announcement of this
information until it is determined whether this information is or is not
credible evidence of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence. The
discoverer should inform his/her or its relevant national authorities.
03. After concluding that the discovery
appears to be credible evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, and after
informing other parties to this declaration, the discoverer should inform
observers throughout the world through the Central Bureau for Astronomical
Telegrams of the International Astronomical Union, and should inform the
Secretary General of the United Nations in accordance with Article XI of the
Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and
Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Bodies. Because of their
demonstrated interest in and expertise concerning the question of the existence
of extraterrestrial intelligence, the discoverer should simultaneously inform
the following international institutions of the discovery and should provide
them with all pertinent data and recorded information concerning the evidence:
the International Telecommunication Union,
the Committee on Space Research, of the International Council of Scientific
Unions, the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of
Astronautics, the International Institute of Space Law, Commission 51
(???) of the International Astronomical Union
and Commission J of the International Radio
Science Union.
04. A confirmed detection of
extraterrestrial intelligence should be disseminated promptly, openly, and
widely through scientific channels and public media, observing the procedures in
this declaration. The discoverer should have the privilege of making the first
public announcement.
05. All data necessary for confirmation of
detection should be made available to the international scientific community
through publications, meetings, conferences, and other appropriate means.
06. The discovery should be confirmed and monitored and any data bearing on the
evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be recorded and stored
permanently to the greatest extent feasible and practicable, in a form that will
make it available for further analysis and interpretation. These recordings
should be made available to the international institutions listed above and to
members of the scientific community for further objective analysis and
interpretation.
07. If the evidence of detection is in the
form of electromagnetic signals, the parties to this declaration should seek
international agreement to protect the appropriate frequencies by exercising
procedures available through the International Telecommunication Union.
Immediate notice should be sent to the Secretary General of the ITU in Geneva,
who may include a request to minimize transmissions on the relevant frequencies
in the Weekly Circular. The Secretariat, in conjunction with advice of the
Union's Administrative Council, should explore the feasibility and utility of
convening an Extraordinary Administrative Radio Conference to deal with the
matter, subject to the opinions of the member Administrations of the ITU.
08. No response to a signal or other
evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be sent until appropriate
international consultations have taken place. The procedures for such
consultations will be the subject of a separate agreement, declaration or
arrangement.
09. The SETI Committee of the International
Academy of Astronautics, in coordination with Commission 51 of the International
Astronomical Union, will conduct a continuing review of procedures for the
detection of extraterrestrial intelligence and the subsequent handling of the
data. Should credible evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence be discovered,
an international committee of scientists and other experts should be established
to serve as a focal point for continuing analysis of all observational evidence
collected in the aftermath of the discovery, and ALSO to provide advice on the
release of information to the public. This committee should be constituted from
representatives of each of the international institutions listed above and such
other members as the committee may deem necessary. To facilitate the convocation
of such a committee at some unknown time in the future, the SETI Committee of
the International Academy of Astronautics should initiate and maintain a current
list of willing representatives from each of the international institutions
listed above, as well as other individuals with relevant skills, and should make
that list continuously available through the Secretariat of the International
Academy of Astronautics. The International Academy of Astronautics will act as
the Depository for this declaration and will annually provide a current list of
parties to all the parties to this declaration.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other
Information:
Documents Regarding the Detection of Extraterrestrial Intelligence
Cover Letter for These Documents
http://seti.org/cover-letter.html
IAA Position Paper: A Decision Process for Examining the Possibility of Sending
Communications to Extraterrestrial Civilizations
http://seti.org/iaa-position-paper.html
Declaration of Principles Concerning Activities Following the Detection of
Extraterrestrial Intelligence
Draft Declaration of Principles Concerning the Sending of Communications to
Extraterrestrial Intelligence Under construction
Other Information:
Executive Summary of a Workshop on the Cultural Aspects of SETI
http://seti.org/caseti.html
Possible Societal Effects
http://seti.org/soc-fx.html
SETI Science
http://seti.org/seti-science.html
SETI Institute - 2035 Landings Drive - Mountain View, CA 94043 (650) 961-6633
IGNORED UFO-FACTS
by most (mainstream) editorial staffs &
pseudo-scepticssystematically denial
and no real investigation!
what are the consequences & implications
if the media are keeping the general public uninformed ???
real freedom of information is needed for a true democracy,
no freedom of information creates a fake democracy!
what are the future consequences if the media are keeping us in the dark
with cheap character-attacks, selective & poor reports
and still creating taboos.
"are they uninformed lazy?" ... or informed ... and playing dumb?
or are they sometimes even dumber ? by thinking that WE are stupid enough to
believe their well payed pseudo-sceptics ?
What are the most important &
convincing (ignored) UFO-FACTS ?
(selection by John Kuhles)
01. Leaked & Official declassified Top Secret UFO-Documents
(CIA-FBI-NSA-ONI-Pentagon etc.) through the Freedom Of Information Act:
www.caus.org & www.blackvault.com
02.
Worldwide UFO-testemonies from Police-Militairy-Pilotshttp://prufos.co.uk & www.narcap.org
03.
04.
Most
www.need2know.tv &
www.watunietmagweten.nl
'Real-X-Files' Europe UFO-info
(M.O.Defense 1999-2002)
06. USAF Blue Book Special Report 14 (1969)
U.S. Airforce Project 'Blue Book'
Huge Catalog of 1,500 UFO's
Project BLUE BOOK UFO Unknowns
(xxxxx.pdf file: 683Kb)
Acrobat Reader needed
08. European Parlement UFO-Report (1990-1993)
09. www.disclosureproject.org (2001-2012)
10. Worldwide UFO-films & foto's & Physical Trace Cases (CE II)
Center for Physical Trace Research
To the best of our knowledge, Ted R. Phillips is the best specialty researcher
on the subject of UFO trace cases in the world, and no website covers the subject better.
Features include mission statement, current cases, video clips & video cam,
background, media updates and cases of "high strangeness"
(one of our favorite USAF terms!).
11. 'The UFO Briefing Document - Best Available Evidence'
dat in 1995 aan zo'n duizend personen wereldwijd
is gestuurd en de
Sturrock Workshop1997,
die beide werden gesponsord door
miljonair Laurance Rockefeller.
12.
You may know that for many years the
US Air Force has
Pilot instructions for UFO reporting (CIRVIS instructions)
in section B-39 of the DoD
(Department of Defense)
Flight Information Handbook (FIH).
Since July 2001
T
he US Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)is for the first time including
a paragraph about UFO reports in its
Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM).
The UFO reporting instructions
are in Section 6, par. 7-6-4,
Safety, Accident, and Hazard Reports
13. American Institute of Astronautics, Kuenttner UFO-Rapport:
1970 UFO-GOVERNMENT-HEARINGS 29-July-1968
HANSARD (Lords), vol. 397, no. 23, January 18, 1979.
On March 10, 1982:
the House of Lords held its second debate on UFOs
1983:
The British government starts to releaseDECLASSIFIED UFO files for the first time.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA still
ignores
the CONTENTS of theseGovernment, AirForce, Navy & Military
declassified Top Secret UFO-Documents
thus keeping the general public uninformed
WHY ???
real freedom of information is
needed in a true democracy,
no freedom of information
creates a fake democracy!
WHY
ARE MAINSTREAM MEDIA & PSEUDO SCEPTICS
IGNORING:
The DIFFERENCE
between a ExtraTerrestrial-BELIEVE ...and a scientific ExtraTerrestrial Hypothesis !!!
PART of the real UFO's are possible ET's a "forbidden" thought ???
E.T. = Extraterrestrial = A form of life assumed to exist outside the Earth
Originating or located or occurring outside Earth
The case for a
scientific ExtraTerrestrial Hypothesisis not that farfetched if you quote
from a SEPRA report:"completely unknown flying machines with exceptional
performances that are guided by a artificial intelligence"
ONE of -many-
Hypothesis is the Extra Terrestrial one!
ATTENTION UFO/E.T. SCEPTICS:
A HYPOTHESIS means according a impartial unprejudiced dictionary:
01. A proposal intended to explain -certain facts- or observations
02. A concept that is not -yet- verified (several causes) but
that if true would explain -certain facts- or phenomena.
03. A message expressing an opinion based on
-PARTIAL- evidence!
Pseudo sceptics IGNORES systematically the DIFFERENCE between
an (easy) "ET-believe"
(incl. from UFO-eyewitnesses) AND
a carefully thought over... evaluated... considered
-ET-Hypothesis ! - (ETH)
made by thousands independent autonomous UFO-INVESTIGATORS worldwide!
who are NOT quoted well, very bad summerised and censored for decades !
Lucky for the pseudo sceptics that the mainstream media talks mostly
about a "believe" not the FACTS that lead to a good -ET-Hypothesis ! -
if the FACTS does not fit in the DOGMA of "science"
than the road to "answers" are made easy for sceptic minds
(including the editorial
staffs of the mainstream media)
than, WHO is really guilty of (negative) wishful thinking ???
Who is fooling WHO ?
investigate...
with an open detective mindset ...or choose the EASY road:
by downplaying the UFO-subject ... make a childish bad summarizes:
(mostly mark, copy paste) of OTHER
subjective summarizes ...
and thinking that you are a "good" sceptic ...
and the mainstream media (editorial staffs)
BELIEVES that this is "okay" or "good enough" to ease their minds ! ...
it fits between the commercials, easy to swallow quotes ...
easy to comprehend that "need no further explanation"
THAT is the mind-trap of our thought-prison:
THINKING that we are "free" ...
Use Translator to translate into YOUR language
http://babelfish.altavista.com/
http://dictionaries.travlang.com/Dutch.html
wat is de beste houding tegenover
"dubieuze" & controversiële
"Real-X-Files" info ???
o.a. -standaard- SLEUTELZINNEN gebruiken
(die Stichting Skepsis amper gebruikt)
in communicatie met wie dan ook, voor een
OPEN & EERLIJKE (!)
discussie (eventueel uitwisseling):
01.
"voor zover mijn kennis reikt ..."
02.
"Als ik goed voorgelicht ben ... dan ..."
03.
"tot nu toe, is mij bekend dat ..."
04.
"Als mijn bronnen correct zijn ... dan ..."
05.
"zover ik kan oordelen over ..."
06.
"Als het 100% vrij is van desinformatie... dan ..."
07.
"Als het geen verborgen agenda's bevat... dan..."
08.
"zover het verifieerbaar & controleerbaar is dan..."
09.
"zolang het vrij is van zelfcensuur, dan ..."
10.
"Als maar een DEEL de waar is, dan ..."
11. "Als mijn bevattingsvermogen het toelaat, dan ..."
12. "Als het niet slecht & zwaar selectief is samengevat, dan ..."
13. "Als het vrij is van negatieve wishful thinking door (pseudo) sceptici, dan..."
14. "Als ik voldoende zin heb, tijd vrijmaak & moeite WIL doen, dan ..."
ze zijn zo "zeker" van zichzelf, dat ze de belangrijkste ingrediënt om
zichzelf een ECHTE scepticus te mogen noemen, missen, namelijk:
gezonde dosis zelf-twijfel !!!
UFO pseudo sceptici kennnen
geen grenzen in gemakzucht & arrogantie:
- als het
effe kan, graag liever niet moeite doen, om verder te kijken.
- slecht tot zeer slecht samenvatten
(meestal van ANDERE subjectieve samenvattingen)
- alleen het aannemelijke voor "waar" aannemen (en denken dat je
daarmee zekerheid
hebt)
- zoeken naar fouten om zo het -hele- onderwerp af te doen als "zie je wel"
dat het "allemaal" onzin is.
- film & media de schuld geven
dat "ZIJ de oorzaak zijn" dat er meer UFO-meldingen binnenkomen.
incest, verkrachting binnen het huwelijk,
wereldwijde pedofiele priesters, asbest affaire,
etc. etc.
"bestaan zeker ook niet" als de media & film er melding van maakt.
ALLE -nieuwe- meldingen van zogenaamde "niet bestaande onderwerpen" is meteen "verdacht"
want je werd "beïnvloed" door de media en/of film industrie...
(bekende "kip of het ei" principe... wat was er eerder)
- vooral zoveel mogelijk de media
laten focussen op kinderlijk eenvoudige
UFO-Cases
die makkelijk -verklaren- zijn! en vervolgens klagen dat "DAT het niveau van de Ufologie" is.
Drs. Molewijk van Skepis gebruikte deze tactiek / truc ook toen hij met mij
in 1993 LIVE over UFO's bij RTL-4 "5 uur show" van Viola Holt was.
de illusie is dat de media steeds maar weer pseudo sceptici als
ontmasker-"specialisten" naar voren schuiven...
omdat ZIJ zogenaamd het "bewijs" hebben dat UFO's "allemaal" vergissingen,
bedrog, psychologisch dwalingen, Venus/Jupiter, luchtballonnen,
laserstralen op wolken etc. etc. zijn, ZONDER te melden dat er een groot
verschil is tussen -MELDING- ... en de UFO ...
Een -melding- moet nog onderzocht worden
(!) en verdient
niet -meteen- predikaat UFO!
maar deze -nuancering- staat in de weg van hun strategie:
"UFO’s zijn allemaal onzin" en die "paar" echte UFOs die dat niet zijn,
vallen bij luie stoel critici ("arm chair sceptics") standaard onder:
"voor ons -nog- onbekende natuurverschijnselen"
ALLE gegevens waaruit af te leiden valt dat het intelligent gedrag vertoond:
zoals vliegroute, snelheid, versnelling, interactie met bvb. piloten, EM-effecten,
fysiologische effecten, geluid, aantasting / afdrukken in grond & vegetatie (CE2) etc.
worden STANDAARD stelselmatig door UFO-pseudo-sceptici genegeerd, ontkend,
verdraaid & bagatelliseert.
Er valt zogenaamd "niets" te leren, het is ongeïdentificeerd:
en als het ongeïdentificeerd is, "dan weet je ook niets" (...)
we weten "niets" om conclusies te -mogen- trekken.
Onderzoeken dat er (diverse) onconventionele antwoorden
oplossingen KUNNEN zijn, is hun TAAK niet!
dus liever
afkraken & "onmogelijk" roepen dan dat je nòg meer kan onderzoeken.
- een
"sceptische" deskundige of wetenschapper die een aura heeft van:
"ik weet wat er zoal te koop is in de wereld van nuchtere erkende wetenschap"
alsof
hij/zij "ALLES" weet wat er ontdekken valt in (conventionele)
wetenschap.
STEL ...
Stel je leest ALLE bijzondere reguliere nuchtere wetenschappelijk -erkende- rapporten,
dossiers, boeken, artikelen, publicaties in erkende wetenschapsbladen VAN:
industrie, universiteiten, (declassified top secret) militaire projecten, multinationals etc. etc.
UIT DE HELE WERELD (inclusief Rusland Japan & China) van de afgelopen 5 jaar ...
stel je zou dat - allemaal - willen lezen !!! ...
dan ben je minimaal 80 jaar
bezig
met lezen ZONDER te slapen
!!!
dan te bedenken dat je nog niet eens iets FYSIEK / CONCREET -zelf-
gecheckt hebt of het echt wel klopt (zoals een echte scepticus dat hoort te doen) ...
Want sjoemelen, belangen & fraude bestaat ook in de reguliere conventionele wetenschap!
en
dan hebben we het nog NIET gehad over ALLE grenswetenschappen
wereldwijd,
dissidenten binnen de wetenschap die baanbrekend
onderzoek gedaan hebben
...
"daar heb je al helemaal geen tijd voor
(of geen zin in) ...
ook al blijkt dat een DEEL van de grens-wetenschappen
decennia jaren later pas erkenning krijgt
!!!
NU SNAPT U MISSCHIEN WAAROM IK HEEL HARD GA LACHEN !
als UFO-pseudo-sceptici (incl. Astronaut Wubbe Ockels) stellig reageren:
"Als het echt wat was, dan had ik het wel geweten"
Zieliger kan het haast niet ...
NOG zieliger is dat meeste -redacties- van mainstream media
te vaak klakkeloos deze zogenaamde "nuchtere wetenschappelijke adviezen"
overnemen
en daarom niet verder hoeven kijken
/
onderzoeken.
Dit verklaart het zeer lage niveau van
de mainstream-media als het over UFO's
gaat.
Vervolgens gebruiken diezelfde UFO-pseudo-sceptici het argument dat
"er weinig zinnigs
te vinden is
in de media over UFO's..."
kijk DAT is nou pure cirkel-redeneren ...
Spelen ze dat ze dom zijn ?
of zijn ze echt dom ?
Wat is dan erger ??? (...)
eindconclusie:
de manier zoals er met UFO informatie wordt omgesprongen is vaak
interessanter
dan de UFO zelf ...
John Kuhles
www.watunietmagweten.nl
POSSIBLE
future domain claims by John Kuhles 2005-2012:need2know.tv time4truth.tv hard2ignore.tv
right2know.tv food4thought.tv unorthodox.tv strangefacts.tv uncensored.tv unconventional.tv countermedia.tvfreedomkeys.tv senseofwonder.tv untold-discoveries.tv untaught-education.tv outsidethebox.tv contra-mainstream.tv think4yourselve.tv out-of-quarantine.tv extraordinary-leads.tv thoughtproviking.tv dissident-media.tv countdownto2012.tv ignored-possibilities.tv ignored-by-mainstream.tv overlooked-by-mainstream.tv notscreened4publication.tv forbiddenquestions.tv deprogramming-statusquo.tv freeing-mainstream-media.tv illegal-thoughts.tv forbidden2investigate.tv outcasted&free.tv unorthodox-media-network.tv maverick-media-network.tv media-heretics-network.tv empowerment-media-network.tv freeyourmind.tv
Deze 300+ Mb Site: VERBODENNIEUWS.NL
inclusief jaren intensief werk & onderzoek
KAN BESTAANSRECHT HEBBEN,
dankzij UW STEUN, GIFTEN, HULP,
evt. donaties & vrijwilligers-werk !
HELPT U MEE OM DEZE SITE
IN DE LUCHT TE HOUDEN ?
wordt DONATEUR, vanaf 10 euro krijgt
u al een CD-Rom als kado opgestuurd!
Giften of donaties naar
Giro 5881516 t.n.v. John Kuhles
vergeet niet uw adres te vermelden
suggesties, opbouwende kritiek,
reacties, vragen, tips, hulp?
vooral TAAL CORRECTIES en vertalingen Engels <--> Nederlands
uitnodiging voor lezingen, heeft u een zaal ter beschikking?
heeft u een goede video-beamer + scherm te leen?
reacties
Richtlijnen-Live-Web-Radio-Verbodenniews-nl.txt