- Peter Orphanides quote:
“Regarding the Pandemic Treaty: This is a policy report from the WHO and the strikethroughs are of serious note and there’s a few links. You’ll definitely want to read them.
It is a naked attack on national sovereignty under the guise of healthcare: The meeting of the WHO officials will be on May 21 to May 28, so there’s the protest locations.
This discusses the treaty in detail and what it means: Since the US is part of the IHR, it doesn’t require 2/3rds Majority of the Senate to sign into the treaty, but a lower level instead.
While not mentioned here, there were mentions of the WHO being allowed to have control over natural disasters (something that is generally an inherently governmental function which CAN involve outside assistance from foreign aid if requested only).
This is an overview and provides advice on how to contact your legislator in order to have good political effect.
While not mentioned here, there were mentions of the WHO being allowed to have control over natural disasters (something that is generally an inherently governmental function which CAN involve outside assistance from foreign aid if requested only). Policy Report & Memo: You will definitely want to note the strikethroughs which are the areas that will give them more power and ignore the rights of nations.
Protest Locations: After all protests are often highly effective in generating change.
BTW: Since FB Limits reach, you Copy & Paste on other platforms and e-mails without credit (I’m not in this for recognition). You can also print the image below as a flyer where people will see it as long as it’s legal (While there’s nothing I can do to stop you from hanging it over an overpass: You bear total legal responsibility for any consequences).
Peter Orphanides: “Regarding the Pandemic Treaty: This is a policy report from the WHO and the strikethroughs are of serious note and there’s a few links. You’ll definitely want to read them. It is a naked attack on national sovereignty under the guise of healthcare: The meeting of the WHO officials will be on May 21 to May 28, so there’s the protest locations This discusses the treaty in detail and what it means: Since the US is part of the IHR, it doesn’t require 2/3rds Majority of the Senate to sign into the treaty, but a lower level instead. While not mentioned here, there were mentions of the WHO being allowed to have control over natural disasters (something that is generally an inherently governmental function which CAN involve outside assistance from foreign aid if requested only). This is an overview and provides advice on how to contact your legislator in order to have good political effect.
While not mentioned here, there were mentions of the WHO being allowed to have control over natural disasters (something that is generally an inherently governmental function which CAN involve outside assistance from foreign aid if requested only) Policy Report & Memo: You will definitely want to note the strikethroughs which are the areas that will give them more power and ignore the rights of nations.
Protest Locations: After all protests are often highly effective in generating change.
BTW: Since FB Limits reach, you Copy & Paste on other platforms and e-mails without credit (I’m not in this for recognition). You can also print the image below as a flyer where people will see it as long as it’s legal (While there’s nothing I can do to stop you from hanging it over an overpass: You bear total legal responsibility for any consequences).”
Heath K. Diane: “Don’t let them sign the WHO PANDEMIC TREATY!
Orphanides: “This discusses the Pandemic Treaty. Since this treaty is international, and the US is a signatory to the IHR (International Health Regulations), it does NOT require 2/3rds majority approval from the US Senate: They’re pushing to implement this in late May, and this provides information, videos, resources for who to contact expressing your disapproval, and locations to protest.
Here are the following links This contains the basic overview, and includes links that I have not linked to here:
These include people to contact: For obvious reasons, you want to communicate in a professional way, but be clear and firm in your opposition to this treaty. You can use the pre-written script or write your own. I think writing your own script is better if possible.
Since this is an international matter: Not everybody speaks English, and it’s wise to get this to people who don’t necessarily speak English very well, and here’s the sources for this.
- This includes a protest location.
I want you to contact the people listed every day since from the TPP to present day, we’ve learned that’s all they understand — relentlessness. To amplify numbers, I’d like it if you share this with as many people as possible with the same encouragement and, lastly: I want people to show up at the protest locations. BTW: You don’t have to agree with Mr. Roguski’s People’s Treaty: All you have to do is disagree with the Pandemic Treaty. You can share with anybody you want and, since FB tends to limit reach, you shouldn’t feel obligated to share only on FB and, where legal, feel free to disperse flyers.”
Please take seriously the severity of this existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our national sovereignty and freedom. On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).
This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as“Provisional agenda item 16.2” at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022. *01
These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.
If passed, the Biden Administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.’s 193 member nations, all of whom belong to WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population. *02
These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.” *03 … U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.
- How It Became Official
On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations. *04 … The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…” *05 … By eliminating that, and other clauses (see below), all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.
The amendments would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation’s alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes. The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.
Although sponsored by an American administration, WHO’s most significant use of this arbitrary authority to declare national emergencies will be used against the United States if our government ever again dares to take anti-globalist stands as it did under the Trump administration.
- How Much Time Do We Have to Stop the Amendments?
The contents of the proposed amendments were not made public until April 12, 2022, *06 … leaving little time to protest before the scheduled vote. As noted, the amendments are scheduled and almost certainly will be enacted May 22-28, 2022.
The existing WHO regulations then provide for an 18-month grace period during which a nation may withdraw its “yes” vote for amendments, but the current proposed amendments would reduce that opportunity to six months. If the U.S.-sponsored amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could, in the next six months, change their individual votes and reverse the approval. But this is a much more difficult proposition than stopping the whole process now.
We must act now to prevent the passage of the amendments, including putting sufficient pressure on the United States to withdraw them from consideration. If that fails, and the amendments are approved at the May meeting of the WHO governing body, we must then make the effort to influence a majority of the nations to change their votes to “no.”
Without Organized Resistance, the Amendments Will Definitely Pass!
On January 26, 2022, the same U. S. Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva sent a one-page memo to WHO confirming that the amendments had been sent. It also contained a brief report by the same Loyce Pace, Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs HHS. *07 … Most importantly, the memo listed all the nations backing the U.S. amendments. The size and power of the group guarantee that the amendments will be passed if unopposed by significant outside pressure.
Here are the 20 nations, plus the European Union, listed by the U.S. as supporting the amendments: Albania, Australia, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, India, Jamaica, Japan, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Peru, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Member States of the European Union (EU).
- The European Union, a globalist organization, has been among the biggest backers of increasing WHO’s global power.
The EU includes the following 27 Western nations: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands 🇳🇱, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden.
That’s a total of 47 nations supporting the U.S.-authored amendments. All of them have endorsed empowering WHO to declare a possible or potential health emergency or crisis within any nation despite its objections and refusal to cooperate. To repeat, these amendments will pass unless American citizens, as well as citizens worldwide, mount a very strong opposition.
- Defining “Health” and WHO’s Domain of Authority
According to the Foreward to WHO’s regulations, there is no specific limit to what constitutes a health emergency, and it is certainly not limited to pandemics. WHO’s domain includes: *08
a scope not limited to any specific disease or manner of transmission, but covering “illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or source, that presents or could present significant harm to humans…
WHO’s powerful reach is also defined by the number of other organizations it is authorized to cooperate with once it has declared an emergency or health crisis: “other competent intergovernmental organizations or international bodies with which WHO is expected to cooperate and coordinate its activities, as appropriate, include the following: United Nations, International Labor Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Civil Aviation Organization, International Maritime Organization, International Committee of the Red Cross, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, International Air Transport Association, International Shipping Federation, and Office International des Epizooties.” *09
The Preamble to the WHO Constitution (separate from the International Health Regulations) summarizes WHO’s concept of what is included under its mandate of improving, guiding, and organizing world health: *10
WHO remains firmly committed to the “principles” set out in the preamble to the Constitution
- Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
- The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.
- The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent on the fullest cooperation of individuals and States.
- The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is of value to all.
- Unequal development in different countries in the promotion of health and control of diseases, especially communicable diseases, is a common danger.
- Healthy development of the child is of basic importance; the ability to live harmoniously in a changing total environment is essential to such development.
- The extension to all peoples of the benefits of medical, psychological, and related knowledge is essential to the fullest attainment of health.
- Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.
- Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures.
Given WHO’s assessment of the breadth of its health concerns, mandates, and goals — almost any kind of problematic situation that affects the people of a nation could be considered a health problem. Indeed, under WHO’s approach, it would be difficult to find any important national issue that was not a potential health problem. With the imminent passage of the American-sponsored amendments to the International Health Regulations, WHO will have free reign for using these expansive definitions of health to call a crisis over anything it wishes in any nation it desires.
- WHO’s Sweeping New Powers
The sweeping new powers will be invested in the Director-General of WHO to act on his own. The Director-General is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, commonly known as Tedros.Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from Ethiopia installed by the Chinese Communist Party. Despite the fact that his role as the cover-up apologist for the Chinese Communists at the onset of COVID-19, this “dear friend of Anthony Fauci” was re-elected without opposition in 2022 to a second five-year term. *11 His original election in 2017, followed by his re-election without opposition in 2022, is an ominous display of Chinese Communist influence over WHO, *12 which makes further empowering the U.N. agency extremely dangerous.
Under the new regulations, WHO will not be required to consult with the identified nation beforehand to “verify” the event before taking action. This requirement is stricken by the U.S. amendments (Article 9.1). The amendments require a response in 24 hours from the identified nation, or WHO will identify it as “rejection” and act independently (Article 10.3). If the identified nation “does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall … immediately share with the other State Parties the information available to it…” (Article 10.4).
Indicating the breadth of WHO’s scope of power, the agency will be given the right to involve multiple other U.N. agencies, including those related to food and agriculture, animal health, environmental programs, “or other relevant entities” (Article 6.1). This, too will not require the permission of the identified nation. The targeted nation is also required to send to WHO any relevant genetic sequence data. And as we have seen, the Foreward to these regulations presents a much larger array of potential collaborating agencies.
Under the proposed regulations, WHO itself would develop and update “early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national, regional, or global risk posed by an event of unknown causes or sources…” (New article 5). Notice that the health-endangering event may be so nonspecific as to have “unknown causes or sources.” Thus, Tedros and any future Director-Generals of WHO will be given unrestricted powers to define and then implement their interventions.
The proposed regulations, in combination with existing ones, allow action to be taken by WHO, “If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring…” (Article 12.2). That is, Tedros need only “consider” that a “potential or actual” risk is occurring.
- Global Supporters of W.H.O.
WHO is not a global powerhouse by itself. Early in the pandemic, it acted as a front group for the international exploiters of humanity, whom we describe in our new book COVID-19 and the Global Predators. In particular, it made certain the Chinese Communists could hide the seriousness of the pandemic while spreading to the world on passenger airplanes from its major cities, including Wuhan itself. We have already noted and documented that the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping have enormous influence over WHO.
Even after Donald Trump slashed the U.S. contribution to WHO in February 2020, the U.S. remained the largest donor to WHO. On March 31, 2020, the U.S. contribution was $115.8 million, followed by China at approximately one-half that amount, followed by Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Brazil. *13
Then in early July 2020, Trump notified Congress and the U.N. that it was formally withdrawing from WHO. Bill Gates quickly announced he was increasing his contribution from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to $250 million. *14
After the Communist Chinese Party, Bill Gates probably has the most influence over WHO. In our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, we describe in Chapter 15 how Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and the giant medical foundation Wellcome Trust created CEPI — The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. This became the center of global predatory activities in preparation for the anticipated pandemic. It brought together key U.S. agencies, including the FDA, CDC, NIAID, NIH, the U.N., WHO, giant pharmaceutical companies, banks, and multiple other sources of wealth and power.
In 2017, or earlier, CEPI made an agreement called a memorandum of understanding with WHO. CEPI then presented a PowerPoint presentation to WHO in July 2017, in effect dividing up the world between the Gates’ CEPI and WHO in the coming pandemic. Gates would handle the financing, supply, and distribution of the vaccines, and WHO would control and monitor the scientific and medical community. Among the stipulations of the PowerPoint, which the Gates-created foundation presented, was that the pharmaceutical companies would be reimbursed for all direct and indirect costs by the government for developing their high-speed manufacturing platforms.
WHO was highly effective during COVID-19 in implementing the aims of the global predators, led by the groups around Bill Gates and the Chinese Communist Party CCP, in their organized assault and terror campaign against the Western democracies. This purposely resulted in the vast weakening of any potentially anti-globalist, freedom-oriented, patriotic nations, including the U.S., Great Britain, Australia, Canada, and others. That success may explain why the global predators chose WHO to now deliver a major and potentially lethal death blow to the sovereignty of the world’s nations.
- Europeans Call for Additional Further Increases in WHO’s Power
There is a growing debate over further increasing the power of WHO to punish uncooperative or dissident nations. *15 Some “have sounded the alarm about giving the WHO too much power at the expense of national sovereignty.” Some have voiced concern about China’s influence on WHO: “Not only has it increased its payment to the WHO in recent years, but it also enjoys a special relationship with its leader.”
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World Health Organization, with President Xi Jinping.
But others are calling for increasing WHO’s ability to sanction non-compliant nations. Echoing recent plans publicized by the Biden administration, some nations are calling for “national and global coordinated actions to address the misinformation, disinformation, and stigmatization that undermine public health.” German Health Minister Jens Spahn has proposed “that countries that fail to follow up on their commitments to the WHO should face sanctions.” Tedros has said, “maybe exploring the sanctions may be important.”
- Treaties with WHO: Another Enormous Threat to Sovereignty — With a Longer Timeline
Before we learned about this current and more immediate threat to U.S. sovereignty, we were focusing on WHO’s plans to begin making treaties with individual nations to take over their general healthcare structures, making WHO the guiding and central authority for the world’s healthcare. In addition to many radio, TV, and public appearances giving the details about this threat, we have written a column on America Out Loud, dated February 18, 2022, “Tedros Introduces Globalist Plan to Take Over World’s Health Systems.” *16
If implemented, the treaties become an even greater threat than the amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, but we have more time to deal with the treaties than with the amendments.
We need to face that these American-sponsored amendments are a great step toward America voluntarily forfeiting its sovereignty to the New World Order or Great (Dystopian) Reset — and that without strong opposition, the ratification of the amendments is a foregone conclusion. Our success or failure in stopping the ratification of these amendments will establish the pattern for the future, including WHO’s ongoing effort to make legally-binding treaties that rob nations of their sovereignty.
- Why Would the U.S. Government Surrender Its Sovereignty?
Why would the U.S. give away its sovereignty to other nations? In reality, that process has been going on at least since President Wilson’s failed attempt to get the Senate to approve U.S. membership in the League of Nations. It has escalated since World War II, often under the umbrella and authority of the United Nations, with which many global predators are enamored and use as the cover story for their predations. As documented in our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators, Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab have both worked out cooperative agreements for their versions of the New World Order with the U.N.
President Biden has recently told the Business Round Table — the presidents and CEOs of the wealthiest 200 corporations in America — that they must lead the growing New World Order: *17
“And now is a time when things are shifting. We’re going to — there’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it. And we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.”
John Kerry, the President’s climate czar, had announced that when Americans elected Biden, they voted for the Great (Dystopian) Reset, whether they knew it or not. *18
- Discussion and Conclusions:
The planning for these devastating U.S.-sponsored amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations has been so stealthy that it might have escaped attention except for the efforts of one individual, James Roguski. He was the first to recognize this threat, and on March 31, 2022, he published a report headlined, “WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution.” *19 He also helped us by reviewing the material and this report with us. Fortunately, our courageous medical colleague Robert Yoho originally alerted us to Roguski’s work and its importance. *20
We are facing an imminent threat to U.S. sovereignty by these legally-binding amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations that — without stiff opposition — will almost certainly be passed during the upcoming meeting of WHO’s governing body, the World Health Assembly, May 22-28, 2022. As noted earlier, there is a six-month grace period following approval of amendments during which countries may withdraw their approval, but a majority doing so seems highly unlikely. Right now, we must focus on preventing the W.H.A. from approving the amendments.
We must immediately mount an international campaign, especially focused within America, to force the U.S. to withdraw these amendments before they come to a vote. Otherwise, America and the nations of the world will take a giant stride toward forfeiting national sovereignty to WHO and the U.N. In reality; they will be forfeiting their sovereign powers to the global predators who rule the U.N. and WHO, including the Chinese Communist Party and WEF supporters of the Great Reset, like Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and giant foundations and corporations — all of whom benefit from weakening or destroying the sovereignty of the Western nations. Western civilization, and mainly the United States, is all that stands in strong opposition to the globalist takeover of the world, called the New World Order or “The Great (Dystopian) Reset“.
- Primary Author: Peter R Breggin MD
references & citation sources:
*01 who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf#page=4 Top lefthand corner provides the date and proposal ID.
*03 International Health Regulations (2005) (who. int) These are the original WHO International Health Regulations before the proposed amendments by the U.S.A. The Overview on this page (before going to the link to the Regulations) in the second sentence contains the statement about their legally binding nature.
*04 who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf#page=4 Note: “Security” warnings sometimes prevent downloading; but changing browsers or repeatedly trying has always succeeded. We are planning an alternative link from www.breggin.com. The document dated January 18, 2022, is found on pages 3-4, From the “Permanent Mission of the United States of America to the United Nations and Other International Organizations in Geneva.” It lists the Amendments as an enclosure, along with a “Letter from HHS Assistant Secretary Loyce Pace.”
*05 who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf#page=4 See p. 6 of the amendments, Article 9 (1.).
*06 who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf#page=4 The date is in the upper righthand corner.
*07 geneva.usmission.gov/2022/01/26/strengthening-who-preparedness-for-and-response-to-health-emergencies/ This is a One-page statement from U.S. to WHO about amendments. Lists supporting nations and DHHS support.
*08 International Health Regulations (2005) (who.int). Download the Regulations and go to the Foreward.
*09 International Health Regulations (2005) (who.int). International Health Regulations, Section on Revision Of The International Health Regulations, pp. 3-4.
*11 foxnews.com/world/world-health-organization-chief-tedros-unopposed-second-term. Even The New York Times had serious reservations about Tedros’ initial nomination, citing allegations of his covering up epidemics in his home country of Ethiopia: nytimes.com/2017/05/13/health/candidate-who-director-general-ethiopia-cholera-outbreaks.html
*15 Swab, Petr. Proposal to Sanction Countries Disobeying WHO Pandemic Response Rules is Concerning: Author. The Epoch Times, April 14, Updated April 19, 2022. Swab’s report is the source for all the quotes in this section. is theepochtimes.com/proposal-of-sanctions-on-countries-disobeying-who-pandemic-response-rules-concerning-author_4405091.html
*18 redstate.com/heartlandinstitute/2020/11/30/john-kerry-great-reset-will-happen-n286949 We have also checked a video of Kerry’s remarks.
<!– edit –>
We need to make hard-copy backups of all 20 source links as soon as possible before it is taken down or “lost in a memory-hole”
<!– end edit –>
- Mel K: W.H.O. Global Pandemic Treaty Strips America of All Our Rights and Power:
Mel K’s Go-To Reputable Resources On The Web.
Many of you have reached out asking for resources where you can find the truth. Well, my Patriot Pals, ask and you shall receive.
Below I have listed many good research resources that have actual facts and data. In my opinion, these sources demonstrate higher journalistic integrity than many of today’s mainstream news sources.
In today’s world many of the facts we read, the logic supporting them, and the media reports are not accurate or are inverted. Lies are now truth and truth and facts are distorted or debunked. Science is either debunked or outright false and opinions are falsely propagandized.
It is common today that once trusted sources of facts and objective opinions are now totally compromised, but that’s an entire rabbit hole in and of itself.
I no longer use Google or Wikipedia for any research, as they both are working against We The People with the corrupt media to gaslight humanity into walking willingly towards our own demise.
I hope this helps you start your own journey towards truth, it is out there! Honestly, once you start down the path, it’s both fascinating and fun! Share what you learn without fear, and always remember armed with truth and facts nothing can stop what is coming! Enjoy!
Mercola: The WHO Pandemic Treaty Closes In On Absolute Control Over “Global Biosecurity”:
- A Backdoor to Global Governance:
As noted by anti-extremism activist Maajid Nawaz in an April 28, 2022, Twitter post, *03 the “WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to global empire.”
COVID-19, while potentially deadly to certain vulnerable groups, simply isn’t a valid justification for handing over more power to the WHO, especially in light of its many inexplicable “mistakes” in this and previous pandemics.
As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021,4 yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. *05 The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission. *06
So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more power to the WHO is about something other than them being the most qualified to make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone.
It seems far more likely that the WHO is being installed as a de facto governing body for the global Deep State. *07 Through the WHO, under the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who seek to own everything and control everyone, will then be able to implement their wishes across the whole world in one fell swoop.
With this treaty in place, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates. If the WHO says every person on the planet needs to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes.
As noted by Corbett, these negotiations are already well underway, *08 and the treaty is expected to be fully implemented in 2024 — that is, unless the people of the world wake up to what’s happening and beat back this monstrosity.
- WHO Likely Seeking to Monopolize Health Care Worldwide
Under the guise of a global pandemic, the WHO, the World Economic Forum (WEF) and all its installed leaders in government and private business, were able to roll out a plan that had already been decades in the making. The pandemic was a perfect cover.
In the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment.
Now, the WHO is gearing up to make its pandemic leadership permanent, extend it into the health care systems of every nation, and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great (Dystopian) Reset.
While this is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general of the WHO is to push the world toward universal health coverage. *09
And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,” *10 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity, *11, *12 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.
Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.
The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed. Without doubt, this can only result in needless suffering, not to mention the loss of individual freedom.
- How the WHO Has Wielded Previous Pandemic Instruments
To give us an idea of how the WHO might end up misusing this new proposed international “instrument” on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, we can look at the International Health Regulations (IHR), *13 which the U.S. signed on to in 2005.
The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). *14 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts.
As noted by Corbett, the IHR allows the unelected director-general of the WHO to simply declare a PHEIC and, suddenly, all member states have to dance to his tune. It basically grants the WHO dictatorial powers over health policy.
PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak in 2019, and, of course, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020. All of these PHEICs were poorly handled and the WHO was criticized as inept and corrupt *15 in their wake.
So, to summarize, through the IHR, the WHO has already been significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines, that didn’t work very well.
In that sense, the WHO is really just another wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences of fast-tracked vaccines. Its handling of the COVID pandemic in particular has been unprecedentedly bad, as they were behind the withholding of early treatment with safe medicines worldwide.
As noted by ivermectin advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie, *16 the WHO has also claimed the mRNA shots as safe as conventional vaccines, which is nowhere near the truth. Most all available data prove they are the most dangerous drugs ever created. Why would anyone expect the WHO to become less corrupt if given even more power and control?
- IHR Amendments May Also Restrict Rights and Freedoms
Now, the IHR overrode and superseded the U.S. Constitution from the start, but in January 2022, the U.S. also submitted regulatory amendments *17 that will give the WHO even more power to restrict your rights and freedoms.
May 22 through 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will gather and vote on these amendments to the IHR and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law. These submitted amendments are in addition to the WHO pandemic treaty currently under discussion. As reported by Health Policy Watch, February 23, 2022: *18
“Washington wants to fast track a series of nitty-gritty, but far-reaching changes in the existing International Health Regulations that govern WHO and member state emergency alert and response — for consideration at this year’s World Health Assembly, 22-28 May.
The U.S. proposal*19 for major IHR rule changes, obtained by Health Policy Watch, has been a topic of discussion in a series of closed-door meetings of WHO member states, which are considering ways to reform the existing IHR, as well as advancing a whole new WHO convention or other international instrument*20on pandemic prevention and response …
The U.S. is expected to lead a parallel track of tightly-paced ‘informal’ member state negotiations to reach consensus on an IHR reform resolution for approval at this year’s 75th WHA [World Health Assembly] …”
The “new WHO convention or other international instrument” mentioned here refers to the WHO treaty currently under discussion. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in December 2021, *21 for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty. And, as mentioned, this INB has begun that work.
However, as noted by Corbett, this is only the second time in the WHO’s history that an INB has been established. The first one was the INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, *22 22 years ago. So, this is not a well-established process, and it’s hard to predict how it will play out.
- Bill Gates Builds GERM Team for the WHO
Another clue about what the WHO intends to do with more power comes from its primary funder, Bill Gates. Gates recently announced he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, which he would like to be called the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team.
This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and “decide when they need to suspend civil liberties, force populations to wear masks and close borders,” The Counter Signal reports. *23
Of course, Gates is also the largest funder of the WHO (when you combine the donations from both his foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). This and other relationships speak volumes about the corruption still ruling the WHO. At the end of the day, Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate to the world what they must do to make Gates a ton of money. As noted by The Counter Signal: *24
“Gates’ announcement of the GERM team coincides with the World Health Organization’s drafting of a global pandemic treaty … In the future, the pandemic treaty will not only ensure that member states abide by International Health Regulations but will also put the WHO in the driver’s seat, so to speak. Member states, including the US and Canada, will take their orders directly from the organization. As Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis explains:
‘The treaty includes 190 countries and would be legally binding. The treaty defines and classifies what is considered a pandemic, and this could consist of broad classifications, including an increase in cancers, heart conditions, strokes, etc. If a pandemic is declared, the WHO takes over the global health management of the pandemic.
Of even more concern, if this treaty is enshrined, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a pandemic. They could dictate how our doctors can respond, which drugs can and can’t be used, or which vaccines are approved. We would end up with a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire world … A one-size-fits-all response to a health crisis doesn’t even work across Canada, let alone the entire globe’ …
It isn’t unreasonable to assume that the GERM team, as a new branch of the WHO, would oversee making sure member states comply with the pandemic treaty after the draft is finalized and member states sign-on.
The next question, then, is how the WHO and Bill Gates would be able to monitor every individual in every country to determine whether enough people are sick to justify locking a region down.
To this end, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system,*25with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID … Thus, there will be one pandemic treaty, one GERM team, one global vaccine passport, and one World Health Organization to monitor every person on the planet.”
- Under WHO Control, Vaccine Passports Are a Given
Indeed, while countries around the world have scrubbed their COVID measures and backed away from vaccine passports, the WHO is still moving ahead with a global vaccine passport program. *26
So, if the WHO is given the authority to dictate biosecurity rules for the world, you can bet they’ll insist on vaccine passports with built-in digital identity and readiness for a centralized programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC). As reported by the Western Standard: *27
“The WHO fully intends to provide support to its 194 member states to facilitate the implementation of the digital verification technology for countries’ national and regional verification of vaccine status.
‘COVID-19 affects everyone. Countries will therefore only emerge from the pandemic together. Vaccination certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust networks and verification technology.
The WHO’s gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records,’ said Garrett Mehl, unit head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation, on Deutsche Telekom’s website.”
- Can We Stop the International Pandemic Treaty?
The question now is, can we stop this “international pandemic instrument” that the WHO is seeking? With short notice, the WHO announced it would accept public comment on the treaty for a total of five days. *28 The World Council for Health (WCH) was among the few that acted quickly enough to submit a comment in opposition of the treaty. Lawrie delivered the WCH’s submission. *29
The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society … It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance. ~ Robert Clancy, Ph.D.
In an April 26, 2022, update on Substack, Lawrie wrote: *30
“Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organizations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people. Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day.”
One person who missed the deadline was professor Robert Clancy, a leading clinical immunologist in Canada. He sent the comment he would have wanted to submit to Lawrie, who included it in her post: *31
“The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society. I am in receipt of the World Council for Health response, and the superbly summarized view by Dr. Tess Lawrie. These concerns reflect the ‘across the board’ view of most Australian doctors …
The failure to understand the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programs, and failure to interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO …
It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance.
The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic, and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease outcomes — supported by the WHO — must make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers.
I write this as the most experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on ‘host-parasite relationship.’ Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)”
- Make Your Voice Heard in June:
While many, like Clancy, didn’t get a chance to participate, the WHO has announced it will allow for two more days of public comment, June 16 and 17, 2022. As noted by Lawrie: *32
“Please also be aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on this May at the World Health Assembly.
Like the pandemic treaty, this is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of individual nations. Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November. James Roguski has written extensively about this on his Substack.*33
There seems to be a concerted effort by the WHO and its controllers to attack our sovereignty from all angles. It is important we make it clear that we do not recognize the WHO as an authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power.
We are sovereign and will not be bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World’s People. They do not act for us and we will not be bound.”
I encourage you to make plans to have your voice heard June 16 and 17, 2022. Unfortunately, the WHO has not yet released any submission details. Your best bet right now is to sign up for the WCH’s newsletter. The last time, they issued links and instructions on how to submit your comment, and are sure to do the same for the June submission window. You can subscribe at the bottom of this page, or on the WCH’s home page.
To block the IHR amendments at the May 2022 World Health Assembly, we need to flood our respective delegations with opposition. A list of U.S. delegates can be found in Roguski’s Substack article, “Speaking Truth to Power.”
For contact information for other nations’ delegates, I would suggest contacting the regional office and ask for a list (see “Regions” in the blue section at the bottom of the World Health Assembly’s webpage). It’s also possible that the WCH will publish guidance on it, so be sure to sign up for their newsletter.
- Sources and References:
1 The Corbett Report April 27, 2022
2 Transcript of The Corbett Report
3 Twitter Maajid Nawaz April 28, 2022
4 World Health Organization, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): How is it transmitted? December 23, 2021
5 J Hosp Infect. 2021 Apr; 110: 89–96
6 Nature April 6, 2022
7 Heysatyamevjayate WordPress March 20, 2022
8 America Out Loud February 18, 2022
9 National Review June 14, 2017
10 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured September 2, 2009 (PDF)
11 The BMJ 2010;340:c2912
12 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured May 1, 2009 (PDF)
13, 14 CDC International Health Regulations
15 Corbett Report April 13, 2010
16, 28, 29 Tess Lawrie Substack April 13, 2022
17, 18 Health Policy Watch February 23, 2022
19 WHO Proposal for Amendments to the International Health Regulations January 20, 2022
20, 21 WHO Proposed Method of Work February 21, 2022
22 INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
23, 24 The Counter Signal May 2, 2022
25, 27 Western Standard March 2, 2022
26 Off-Guardian March 1, 2022
30, 31, 32 Tess Lawrie Substack April 26, 2022
33 James Roguski Substack March 31, 2022
- source article
Re: Biden Handing Over U.S. Sovereignty to WHO ‘Global Governance’ 2022
- Some things are obvious and all actions are part of a bigger whole and all are connected:
01. Raise awareness of the issue in all forms possible use many different tactics.
02. Make a list of best questions you want answered by Politicians & Mainstream Media … it is not about expecting them to be honest or frank … but to let them know how they fail to ask these questions themselves! Let them know we are on to them! And others will join asking the same critical questions!
03. Write an open (public) letter to key-people about this issue!
04. Interview people who are best informed on this issue!
05. Use or produce Satire like AwakenWithJP does!
06. Make protest music using lyrics to educate the masses about this issue.
07. Explain in your own words why you think people should read/study this Project Avalon Thread make a video or audio about it and put it online!
08. Make art in any way to reach a wider audience.
09. Organize protest-marches or seek one or approach some one who has experience organizing big ones.
10. Organize a professional petition (it is not about assuming “they listen” but much more about networking with others …).
11. Create a new
website or channel or any other social media platform specific focusing on this issue.
12. Make design catchy posters/flyers you spread everywhere you can!Use “gofundme type” fundraising sites or your raise awareness project!
13. Give lectures or organize conferences yourself where you know who to invite as best speakers.
14. Send emails and/or physical letters to all key-people you know … ask for help!
15. Write an article for your local newspaper!
16. Make/design catchy T-shirts/Stickers/Hats/Mugs etc. etc. there are literary 1000s of sites who can arrange that for you >>> all depends if it works for your targeted audience & country!
17. Produce a “mini documentary” in such a way it can go viral if you know how to make it effective in making the best summary to date. Most assume they can not do it, but actually it is not that hard to make … unless you never used a video edit software before … I have used multiple different professional video-edit software programs since 1997 onward. Promote the best sites/sources in this “mini documentary”.
18. Go to all big Conspiracy Research Forums … register, become a member and promote all the above!
19. Try to find a way to “trick” any celebrity to answer your profound questions and record it on cam or audio! … Be smart in how you frame the question!
20. Organize your own opinion poll via site or physical door to door! Very important how you frame the questions!
21. Try to find a way to be live on any mainstream media radio or tv to promote your efforts about this issue! … Study how people like Mark Dice started by doing exactly that!
22. Make an overview of the best videos & audio podcasts discussing the issue and show it to others!
23. Go to similar protest marches that has some overlappings exposing the New World Order Agenda … I was among others present/active at the “Occupy Movement” Amsterdam 2011, 9/11 Protest March (Rotterdam 2011), Anti-Chemtrail Demonstration The Hague 2016, Big Anti-Bilderberg Conference Protest March in Dresden Germany 2016, Big Stop5G Demonstration in The Hague (Den Haag) 2017 etc. etc. >>> When you find like-minded people there you can spread flyers about any new issue!
24. Same as 23. and replace “protest marches” with “big conferences” discussing similar topics related to exposing the New World Order agenda (umbrella for 100s of topics & issues).
25. Do something unique
to raise awareness >>> like using a sponge with a bucket of water (add some natural citric) to clean up a dirty tunnel with lot of cars traffic ask some friends to film you while you are doing it … then write big letters when cleaning part of the tunnel like being a “graffiti artist” without using any paint nor any other (illegal) chemicals … Big chance the police will show up as they see it on their CCTV cameras … Then you explain to them you are not doing anything illegal as you are using only totally harmless substances.
- As far as I am aware, cleaning up public space is not a crime! … So most likely the police will leave you alone without any charges … This activism tactic was actually done in Germany and the video went super-viral because of how many police cars showed up with flashing lights lol … There are so many ways to do something that stands out without breaking any laws … an having fun at the same time.
- If successful and your efforts gets viral … your may gain 1000s of new subscribers to your video-channel within a month.
26. to be continued soon …
John Kuhles aka ‘ExomatrixTV’
May 13th, 2022 🦜🦋🌳
- ps. most of the suggestions I share here, I actually done it in the past last 32 years that I am pro-active … so am used to answer the: “what can I do” question for a long time
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Let us improve this post!
Tell us how we can improve this post?